Obama Likes 3D Printing

During last night's annual State of the Union address, US President Obama actually mentioned 3D printing and positioned it as one of his key strategies for reinvigorating the US manufacturing industry. 

 

Specifically, he's extending the experiment begun at the National Additive Manufacturing Innovation Institute experiment, launched in August 2012. This institute attempts to speed adoption of new manufacturing technologies and consequently beef up the US economy. 

 

Obama said: 

 

There are things we can do, right now, to accelerate this trend. Last year, we created our first manufacturing innovation institute in Youngstown, Ohio. A once-shuttered warehouse is now a state-of-the art lab where new workers are mastering the 3-D printing that has the potential to revolutionize the way we make almost everything. There's no reason this can't happen in other towns.

 

So tonight, I'm announcing the launch of three more of these manufacturing hubs, where businesses will partner with the Departments of Defense and Energy to turn regions left behind by globalization into global centers of high-tech jobs.

 

And I ask this Congress to help create a network of 15 of these hubs and guarantee that the next revolution in manufacturing is made right here in America. We can get that done.

 

It seems that the NAMII experiment was sufficiently successful to warrant a rather large expansion. Three similar labs will be launched, followed by another eleven to create Obama's 15 node 3D printing network.

 

This is a very bold step and recognizes the incredible potential of 3D printing technology. Not only will the lab network vastly increase the knowledge of and access to 3D printing over the long term, but Obama's mere mention of 3D printing in what could be the most widely listened to public speeches will cause many people to discover 3D printing for the first time. Already we're seeing small boosts in the stock prices of 3D Systems, Stratasys and ExOne today. 

Are FabLabs Enough?

We're reading a fascinating and provocative article by entrepreneur Nick Pelling detailing his thoughts around the uses of 3D printing, manufacturing processes and creativity. 

 

Pelling feels that the simple Fablabs sprouting up all over are insufficient for inventors and entrepreneurs to truly prototype for mass production. Prototypes "for looks", just aren't good enough. 

 

We tend to agree; FabLab equipment is often quite basic and doesn't offer the capability to produce fine prototypes. But they can often produce "rough prototypes". In some cases a rough prototype is what you need to persuade an investor to provide the minimum funding to go to the next step, likely a real prototype. 

 

Via Nanodome (Hat tip to Sam E)

US Government To Operate Fab Labs?

What? We think of Fab Labs as independent operations supplying a focus for local fabrication activities, channeling ideas, tools, techniques, parts and space together where Great Things Evolve. Typically they spring up out of grassroots ideas from strong proponents who just make it happen, sometimes with local academic or corporate sponsorship. But now we read this:

 

H.R.6003 -- National Fab Lab Network Act of 2010 (Introduced in House - IH)

HR 6003 IH

111th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 6003

To provide for the establishment of the National Fab Lab Network to build out a network of community based, networked Fabrication Laboratories across the United States to foster a new generation with scientific and engineering skills and to provide a workforce capable of producing world class individualized and traditional manufactured goods.

 

Wow! They say:

A new kind of national infrastructure will be required in order to adequately take advantage of leading edge digital fabrication technologies to secure the United States' leading position in scientific fields and to promote a robust manufacturing base.

 

They are proposing (as this Act has not yet passed) to establish a non-profit entity to manage a national network of fabrication laboratories, coordinating activities between them. The new "NFLN" would be the first point of contact for anyone wishing to create a new Fab Lab; set standards for Fab Labs and judge whether requestors are able to meet them; hook up sponsors and fabricators to make it happen; promote the idea of fabrication via labs to the public. 

 

They want to establish "at least one Fab Lab per every 700,000 individuals in the United States in the first ten years of its operation". Um, our simplistic arithmetic shows this would be 438 Fab Labs, based on 307,006,550 residents (from July 2009) divided by 700,000. Many cities would have several Fab Labs, if this scheme works. Oh, and the population is likely to grow a tad by ten year's time.

 

But how is it funded? The bill says: "The NFLN may accept donations from private individuals, corporations, government agencies, or other organizations." In other words, it's really intended to organize the ongoing Fab Lab phenomenon. What do you think of this proposal?

 

Via Library of Congress and Govtrack (Hat tip to Bryan)

Image Credit: CabFabLab

Visiting a FabLab

There's a great photojourney of a visit through Aachen's FabLab at lekernel’s scrapbook, including images of their 3D printer, laser cutter and milling machine. What exactly is a "FabLab"? Here's the Wikipedia definition:

 

A Fab Lab (fabrication laboratory) is a small-scale workshop with an array of computer controlled tools that cover several different length scales and various materials, with the aim to make "almost anything". This includes technology-enabled products generally perceived as limited to mass production.

 

However, during the FabLab tour, some controversy is observed:

The 3D printer produces object of outstanding quality. It uses regular plastic wire (the same as in Reprap), however, the manufacturer is trying to make sure that only their wire (that they sell with a large profit margin) is being used in the machine. The wire cartridges come with a chip that prevents them from being refilled with inexpensive plastic wire. Unfortunately, the fablab people did not even try to hack the system for fear of breaking the machine. Come on!

 

That just might be the price to be paid to receive quality prints, at least until RepRap/MakerBot/BFB raise their products' capabilities.

 

Via  lekernel’s scrapbook