Commons:Undeletion requests

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from Commons:UNDEL)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Translate this page

Shortcut: COM:UNDEL · COM:UR · COM:UD · COM:DRV

Other languages:
العربية • ‎Cymraeg • ‎Deutsch • ‎English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎galego • ‎magyar • ‎italiano • ‎日本語 • ‎Ripoarisch • ‎polski • ‎پښتو • ‎português • ‎русский • ‎svenska • ‎українська • ‎中文

On this page, users can ask for a deleted page or file (hereafter, "file") to be restored. Users can comment on requests by leaving remarks such as keep deleted or undelete along with their reasoning.

This page is not part of Wikipedia. This page is about the content of Wikimedia Commons, a repository of free media files used by Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia Commons does not host encyclopedia articles. To request undeletion of an article or other content which was deleted from the English Wikipedia edition, see the deletion review page on that project.

Commons deletion (policy)

Contents

Finding out why a file was deleted

First, check the deletion log and find out why the file was deleted. Also use the What links here feature to see if there are any discussions linking to the deleted file. If you uploaded the file, see if there are any messages on your user talk page explaining the deletion. Secondly, please read the deletion policy, the project scope policy, and the licensing policy again to find out why the file might not be allowed on Commons.

If the reason given is not clear or you dispute it, you can contact the deleting administrator to ask them to explain or give them new evidence against the reason for deletion. You can also contact any other active administrator (perhaps one that speaks your native language)—most should be happy to help, and if a mistake had been made, rectify the situation.

Appealing a deletion

Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone. Proposals to change the policies may be done on their talk pages.

If you believe the file in question was neither a copyright violation nor outside the current project scope:

  • You may want to discuss with the administrator who deleted the file. You can ask the administrator for a detailed explanation or show evidence to support undeletion.
  • If you do not wish to contact anyone directly, or if an individual administrator has declined undeletion, or if you want an opportunity for more people to participate in the discussion, you can request undeletion on this page.
  • If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers.

Temporary undeletion

Files may be temporarily undeleted either to assist an undeletion discussion of that file or to allow transfer to a project that permits fair use. Use the template {{Request temporary undeletion}} in the relevant undeletion request, and provide an explanation.

  1. if the temporary undeletion is to assist discussion, explain why it would be useful for the discussion to undelete the file temporarily, or
  2. if the temporary undeletion is to allow transfer to a fair use project, state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

To assist discussion

Files may be temporarily undeleted to assist discussion if it is difficult for users to decide on whether an undeletion request should be granted without having access to the file. Where a description of the file or quotation from the file description page is sufficient, an administrator may provide this instead of granting the temporary undeletion request. Requests may be rejected if it is felt that the usefulness to the discussion is outweighed by other factors (such as restoring, even temporarily, files where there are substantial concerns relating to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). Files temporarily undeleted to assist discussion will be deleted again after thirty days, or when the undeletion request is closed (whichever is sooner).

To allow transfer of fair use content to another project

Unlike English Wikipedia and a few other Wikimedia projects, Commons does not accept non-free content with reference to fair use provisions. If a deleted file meets the fair use requirements of another Wikimedia project, users can request temporary undeletion in order to transfer the file there. These requests can usually be handled speedily (without discussion). Files temporarily undeleted for transfer purposes will be deleted again after two days. When requesting temporary undeletion, please state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

Adding a request

First, ensure that you have attempted to find out why the file was deleted. Next, please read these instructions for how to write the request before proceeding to add it:

  • In the Subject: field, enter an appropriate subject. If you are requesting undeletion of a single file, a heading like [[:File:DeletedFile.jpg]] is advisable. (Remember the initial colon in the link.)
  • Identify the file(s) for which you are requesting undeletion and provide image links (see above). If you don't know the exact name, give as much information as you can. Requests that fail to provide information about what is to be undeleted may be archived without further notice.
  • State the reason(s) for the requested undeletion.
  • Sign your request using four tilde characters (~~~~). If you have an account at Commons, log in first. If you were the one to upload the file in question, this can help administrators to identify it.

Add the request to the bottom of the page. Click here to open the page where you should add your request. Alternatively, you can click the "edit" link next to the current date below. Watch your request's section for updates.

Archives

Closed undeletion debates are archived daily.

Current requests

Watch View Edit

File:Participation Party.jpg

In some countries witch include Japan and South Korea, escheat copyright works became public domain. --Sharouser (talk) 17:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

If there is an exclusion in the local copyright law that is not implemented into our copyright templates, it should be discussed in COM:VPC before posting here. If it is already implemented, please point out appropriate template (or exact paragraph in the copyright law if you need help to find it; or court cases). The {{PD-textlogo}} rationale was rejected in the Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Pipenavis. Ankry (talk) 06:30, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Template:PD-South Korea contains escheat cases. (There are exceptional cases. Property rights are to belong to the state according to provisions of the Civil Law and other laws upon the death of a copyright owner without heir or, in the case of a legal person or organization, upon its dissolution. )
Participation Party was merged into the Unified Progressive Party. After the dissolution of Unified Progressive Party by the Constitutional Court of Korea, All of property of UPP was transfered to South Korean government.
  • Political Parties Act of Korea, Article 48
    • The residual assets of a political party dissolved by a ruling for dissolution by the Constitutional Court, shall revert to the National Treasury.
  • In that case, copyrigts are become public domain by South Korean copyright law Article 49(Expiry of Author's Property Rights)
  • South Korean copyright law Article 49(Expiry of Author's Property Rights)
  • Author's property rights shall expire in any of the following cases:
  • 1.Where, after the author's death without heir, author's property rights are to belong to the state according to provisions of the Civil Law and other laws
  • and
  • 2. Where, after the dissolution of a legal person or an organization who is the owner of author's property rights, author's property rights are to belong to the state according to the provisions of the Civil Law and others laws. 
There is an exclusion in the local copyright law that is implemented into our copyright templates. {{PD-South Korea}} --Sharouser (talk) 11:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

File:2018年台风玛利亚登陆前连江一户人家凉台花盆舞蹈.webm

And also:

Authorized mail has been sent long ago. However, the mail has not been confirmed. - I am Davidzdh. 07:21, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question @Davidzdh: do you have ticket numbers? Did you tag the files {{subst:OP}} as instructed at OTRS and COM:CONSENT?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:00, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.:Some people have not told me ticket numbers so that I only have these up to now:
  • Ticket#: 2018081210002114
  • Ticket#: 2018081210002098
  • Ticket#: 2018081210002892
  • Ticket#: 2018081310006494
  • Ticket#: 2018081210005988
  • Ticket#: 2017071410005022

- I am Davidzdh. 01:43, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

So can these files be restored now?- I am Davidzdh. 08:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Wealden ostracod environments.jpg

I discovered that the file was deleted because somebody decided that it "These files look professional and I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license." It looks professional because it is professional - I am a professional - and I am the copyright holder. I chose to make it freely available via Wikimedia Commons because I was asked to provide it (and several other figures) for a web page in support of a podcast that I recorded. As I indicated clearly in the text I supplied with it: This is an original diagram; a modified, black-and-white version of it was published as Text-fig. 12.3 in: Horne, D.J. 2011. Ostracods. In Batten, D.J. (ed.), English Wealden Fossils, 125–137. The Palaeontological Association, London, Field Guides to fossils 14, ix + 769 pp. It differs from the published version (to which the Palaeontological Association holds the copyright) in several aspects of layout and detail as well as the use of colour.

If I can get this image reinstated on Wikimedia Commons I will then go through the same procedure with others that were provided in support of the podcast but have since been deleted.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidjhorne (talk • contribs) 21:04, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Nominated here: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Davidjhorne. Thuresson (talk) 21:48, 24 August 2018 (UTC)


File:Jetstar Airbus A320 VH-XJE.jpg

Please undelete this file because its my work. This is seriously my work (100 serious). This file only been posted on wikimedia, also 100% serious.

HutheMeow (talk) 07:15, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Please delete this file because its really my work and as it said "own work" in the image infobox. If the file will be restored, I agree to abide the rules and refrain from bad actions and violations. HutheMeow (talk) 10:22, 1 September 2018 (UTC) [1]

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:32, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
@HutheMeow: What will you do if it's not restored? Pinging @Srittau, Jdx, Jcb, Guanaco.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:32, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
I see how this could be interpreted as a threat of disruption, but I'll assume that isn't the intended meaning. Regarding the images, I'll Symbol support vote.svg Support undeleting the ones taken with the same camera unless there is evidence that some were taken from the web. There has been doubt about HutheMeow's contributions, but I'm willing to give them a chance. Of course, if these explicit claims of "own work" here are proven to be false, we can't trust anything they upload ever. An indefinite block would then be warranted. Guanaco (talk) 08:12, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
@Guanaco: Can you look into the camera metadata and evidence of having been taken from the web without restoring?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:18, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: I can undelete them temporarily or I can download them to my computer and examine them. I'm doing some file transfers and a fresh Linux install now, so I'll make a proper list in the next day or so. I've seen a Canon camera and an Olympus. Guanaco (talk) 08:21, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - this user still cannot be trusted, see here. Yesterday they still claimed that all their uploads "belonged" to them, whatever that may mean. Jcb (talk) 09:42, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

No uploads that had "own work" were false, except for the ones that were unlicensed, but the rest of them were mine for real, so please trust me and that they belonged to me. Just please let me have another chance. HutheMeow (talk) 11:08, 1 September 2018 (UTC) Template:Undelete

Full list of files

Here's the full list of files. Looking at them now. Guanaco (talk) 02:22, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

No identifiable camera

Apple iPhone 7

Apple iPhone 6

Samsung WB250F/WB251F/WB252F

Canon EOS 30D

Canon EOS 1300D

Olympus VG165,D765

Most are low resolution, often indicating a copyright violation.

Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT

Apple iPhone 5c

Sorting out

There are a lot of images here, and sorting these while they're deleted is tedious. Huthemeow did upload a few blatant copyvios, but they are clearly distinguishable from the others in this set. I did check several via Google Images and couldn't find any matches. Symbol support vote.svg Support undeleting them all with the noted exceptions. Most of the unsorted files seem to be from the Olympus camera, and if there is specific cause for concern about some images, they can be renominated for deletion. Guanaco (talk) 03:17, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

@Guanaco: if you (temporarily) undelete the lot I think I can sort them way quicker than you can. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:43, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
@Guanaco: I will undelete the Olympus files for now. They seem safe at least and can be excluded from the discussion already. Jcb (talk) 21:29, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. This will be much easier to sort out now. Guanaco (talk) 21:54, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
All the files are grouped by camera now. Jcb (talk) 22:11, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Images from Flickr author 62558987@N07

Some Flickr users are labeled bad users for a small number of their images uploaded. This means that not all images that they have uploaded to Flickr are problamatic. I had inquired with the editor that had labeled this author a bad user (@Ronhjones) about the rationale behind their labeling them a bad author before I uploaded these images.SecretName101 (talk) 18:43, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

@SecretName101: File:Renato Mariotto 2483.jpg is a redirect to deleted File:Renato Mariotti 2483.jpg.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:51, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Fixed that earlier today after seeing your comment.SecretName101 (talk) 23:53, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Images of copyrighted documents were uploaded from this Flickr account. I cannot say that all the Flickr images are bad, just that they each need a careful examination, and not let the Flickr bot just pass them sight unseen. Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:15, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
I decided that I should ping @Srittau (who deleted these images) to inform them. It appears they misunderstood that the "bad user" label was not an explicit indication that these particular images were themselves problematic.
It seems to me that their rationale for deleting these images centered upon a misunderstanding about the nature/exact implications of the "bad user" label. It would be helpful for them to provide imput into whether or not that is the case.SecretName101 (talk) 23:53, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
I would push that these images should be undeleted (at least temporarily). Can easily be re-deleted if there is found reason to question the validity of 62558987@N07's claimed authorship of the images.
The photos in question were found on two flickr photo albums: this one and this one
It seems that these images were genuinely authored by Kurman Communications (the owner of the flickr account 62558987@N07). These appear to have been taken in order to promote Aaron Goldstein's campaign for the Democratic nomination in Illinois' 2018 Attorney General election. Goldstein's campaign committee did, in fact, employ the public-relations services of Kurman Communications, as can be evidenced by campaign expenditures such as this. His campaign reported three payments to Kurman Communications for PR and consulting services.SecretName101 (talk) 00:02, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Jingle_Deutsche_Welle_bis_1984.ogg

Hallo ihr Lieben, ich möchte gerne, dass meine Tondatei "Jingle_Deutsche_Welle_bis_1984.ogg" wiederhergestellt wird. Es gibt bereits einen schriftlichen Vorgang dazu:

Wortlaut meiner Erklärung vom 31.07.2018: 

-Anm.: Setze "Tondatei" für "Bild"-

Sehr geehrtes Support-Team, ich, Immo Fxxxxxxg, erkläre in Bezug auf das Bild »Jingle_Deutsche_Welle_bis_1984.ogg«, dass ich dessen Urheber/in bin. Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz »Creative-Commons-Lizenz „Zero in Version 1.0“«. Ich genehmige somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch kommerziell oder gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann. Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die freie Lizenzierung nur auf das Urheberrecht sowie verwandte Rechte bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, auf Grund anderer Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen. Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft in Wikipedia oder einem ihrer Schwesterprojekte eingestellt wird.

Die Tonfolge entstammt der Oper Fidelio von Ludwig van Beethoven: "Es sucht der Bruder seine Brüder"

Vorgangs-Nummer: 2026-8bc3bf40002a4327. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Immo Fxxxxxxxg

Daraus entstand ein Ticket#2018073110007746

Von: Permissions - German Wikipedia [2] Gesendet: Freitag, 10. August 2018 14:39 An: Immo Fxxxxxxg Betreff: Re: [Ticket#2018073110007746] Freigabe »Jingle_Deutsche_Welle_bis_1984.ogg«

Guten Tag Immo Fxxxxxxxg, vielen Dank für Ihre Freigabe. Es handelt sich hier offenbar um eine Audiodatei. Bitte geben Sie noch an, aufgrund welcher Umstände Sie Inhaber der Nutzungsrechte sind.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Alfred Neumann Wikimedia-Support-Team

Meine Antwort ebenfalls vom 10.8.18:

Hallo liebes Team, bei der Tondatei handelt es sich um den Zusammenschnitt einer eigenen Tonaufnahme von einer Kurzwellen-Rundfunk-Aussendung der Deutsche Welle aus dem Jahr 1983. Ich habe den Ausschnitt bearbeitet und in eine .ogg Datei formatiert. Ich gehe davon aus, dass der "Mitschnitt" legal ist und der Sender (die Sendeanstalt) keinen Anspruch auf Schutz erhebt. Die Tonfolge entstammt der Oper Fidelio von L. van Beethoven, Finale/ Nr 16, Don Fernando: "Es sucht der Bruder seine Brüder" (Anlage Original-Ausschnitt). Liebe Grüße und vielen Dank für die Mühen

Ergänzung:

Ich kann hinzufügen, dass die originale Tonfolge als "Historisches DW-Pausenzeichen, auf Celeste gespielt" angehört und heruntergeladen werden kann. Hier der Downloadlink: https://radiodownloaddw-a.akamaihd.net/Events/dwelle/dira/mp3/deu/DD8A4511_2_dwdownload.mp3 und die Seite mit dem Link: https://www.dw.com/de/beethovens-fidelio-eine-kurze-geschichte-der-dw-erkennungsmelodie/a-43640867

Also hoffe ich auf Freigabe und Wiederherstellung zur freien Verwendung in Wikipedia. Wäre eine tolle Geschichte! Schon mal Danke dafür.

Bis Dann!--OldfashionFreak (talk) 17:31, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose aus zwei Gründen. Erstens, der Rückstau der Email-Freigaben liegt derzeit leider bei 129 Tagen, also wird es noch eine Weile dauern, bis diese Datei an der Reihe ist. Der zweite Grund ist aber wichtiger: Die DW-Sendungen sind keineswegs frei von Urheberrechten und die Jingle-Tonfolge aus Fidelio ist m. M. nach lang genug, um geschützt zu sein. D h. die Mitschnitte hätten so nicht ohne Freigabe zusammengestellt werden dürfen. Dass das Pausenzeichen online verfügbar ist, heißt auch nicht automatisch, dass jedermann es nach Belieben herunterladen und weiterverbreiten darf. De728631 (talk) 13:45, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Perfect Blue Sky Mailaul May 2018 RU Photo by Oliver Kuusk.jpg

Hi My name is Jane Kitto Andersson We have been made submissions from both the photographer Oliver Kuusk and myself to have the photograph un deleted please. Perfect Blue Sky Mailaul May 2018 RU Photo by Oliver Kuusk .jpg / Mailaul-6346.jpg

We have both followed all the procedures and the request forms and would like to have the photo reinstated so we can use on our wikipedia page as a main picture. Please see the history of our requests. thankyou in advance.

Best regards Jane

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Missnoise (talk • contribs) 15:46, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:40, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 133 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. @Missnoise: Did you tag the file {{subst:OP}} as instructed at OTRS and COM:CONSENT?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:40, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Jeff So sorry but because i find the language here hard to follow like signing posts..where to place things etc.im not sure sorry of how to do or what it means..! .we however did all the formailties for the undeletions especially the photographer.. poor guy made declarations etc i cant ask more of him now.. Its so complicated! i just hope we van have ouor photograph reinstated.. please. thanks

kind regards Jane

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Missnoise (talk • contribs) 18:43, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
@Missnoise: Ticket:2018062410002891 does not contain permission for that filename.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: The two photos appear to be slightly different crops of the same image. If that makes any difference. --Majora (talk) 01:35, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
@Majora: Sorry, which photo mentioned in that ticket (or other photo, perhaps one of the other half dozen of the OP's deleted files) is similar to File:Perfect Blue Sky Mailaul May 2018 RU Photo by Oliver Kuusk.jpg?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:09, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: The one mentioned in the ticket, File:Perfect Blue Sky Mailaul Festival Estonia Photo Oliver Kuusk.jpg, and the one requested here, File:Perfect Blue Sky Mailaul May 2018 RU Photo by Oliver Kuusk.jpg, are different crops of the same photo. --Majora (talk) 22:44, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
@Majora: Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:34, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Various ithkuil illustrations

Hi. I'm contesting the deletion of these files, on the ground that I had specified the licensing informations in the following way:

“According to the permissions attached by John Quijada to this files: « You may copy or excerpt any portion of the contents of this website for private, individual, or personal use which is non-commercial in nature and not for purposes of profit. Otherwise, you may copy or excerpt brief portions of the contents of this website in published, web-accessible, or commercially distributed articles, papers or webpages for purposes of review, commentary or analysis, provided you give full attribution to the author and this website. »”

This can be seen at the bottom of the ithkuil.net website I took these images from.

Copyright has never been my strength, but I believe I did not do anything wrong? If I did, do tell me what, and I will gladly reupload the files in accordance to the rules. Assuming I did in fact violate a copyright, I think my contestation of the first file of the list still applies, based on the fact that it is a simple geometrical figure.

Thank you and sorry for the bother. --Orikrin1998 128px-Nuvola man icon.pngNuvola apps email.png 22:29, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

It is the non-commercial restriction Orikrin1998. That is against one of the main rules of our licensing policy. It must be under a license that allows anyone to use or modify the image, at any time, and for any purpose. Including commercial reuse. As a side note, please change your signature per COM:Signatures#Images in signature. The images have to be removed. Thanks. --Majora (talk) 22:35, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
I see, thanks for explaining this to me. May I reiterate my request regarding the first file? --Orikrin1998 (talk) 13:23, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Hmm...I never actually looked past the "non-commercial" before. But now that I do these might actually be ok. Magog the Ogre, these are apparently language glyphs. Would that not put them under {{PD-script}}? I'm not familiar with how copyright law deals with "constructed languages" (although all language is inherently constructed at some point). So if these are just "letters" of a language they may be ok, Orikrin1998. --Majora (talk) 19:07, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Yeah they are, you can find them here. I actually never had a doubt it would be acceptable until the files were deleted haha. But don't worry, licensing has always been an undecipherable mystery to me.
For your information, constructed languages are better called artificial, on the ground that they are created by one person, or a small group of people, over a small period of time, as opposed to natural languages. And conlangs, as far as I know, are tagged with fair use policies.
Thanks for the update! --Orikrin1998 (talk) 20:32, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Entlöschung File:Christian Mühlhäuser 2018.jpg und weitere

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

ich hatte im Juni drei Bilder in die Wikimedia Commons hochgeladen, die wegen fehlender Quelle und Genehmigung gelöscht wurden. Die Urheber dieser Werke hatten - leider verspätet - jeweils ihre Genehmigung für die Verwendung in Wikimedia Commons gegeben.

Die URLs zu den gelöschten Bildern finden Sie mit den dazugehörigen Ticketnummern hier: 1) File:Christian Mühlhäuser 2018.jpg Urheber: Christian Stommel Ticket#: 201807021000318 Link zur ehemaligen Datei: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Christian_M%C3%BChlh%C3%A4user_2018.jpg

2) File:Christian Mühlhäuser mit Tarek Al-Wazir.png Urheber: Julia Isabel Mestwerdt Ticket#: 2018071210008718 Link zur ehemaligen Datei: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Christian_M%C3%BChlh%C3%A4user_mit_Tarek_Al-Wazir.png

3) File:Christian Mühlhäuser mit Volker Bouffier.png Urheber: Philipp Grevy Ticket#2018071010008758 Link zur ehemaligen Datei: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Christian_M%C3%BChlh%C3%A4user_mit_Volker_Bouffier.png

Ich bitte um Entlöschung, weil alle notwendigen Informationen nun vorliegen.

Vielen Dank --LuBae (talk) 14:30, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Deletion File: Christian Mühlhäuser 2018.jpg and others

Dear Sir or Madam, In June, I uploaded three images to the Wikimedia Commons that were deleted due to lack of source and approval. The authors of these works had - unfortunately delayed - each given their approval for use in Wikimedia Commons. The URLs to the deleted pictures can be found here with the corresponding ticket numbers here: 1) File:Christian Mühlhäuser 2018.jpg Created by: Christian Stommel Ticket:201807021000318 Link to the former file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Christian_M%C3%BChlh%C3%A4user_2018.jpg 2) File:Christian Mühlhäuser with Tarek Al-Wazir.png Author: Julia Isabel Mestwerdt Ticket:2018071210008718 Link to the former file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Christian_M%C3%BChlh%C3%A4user_mit_Tarek_Al -Wazir.png 3) File:Christian Mühlhäuser with Volker Bouffier.png Copyright: Philipp Grevy Ticket:2018071010008758 Link to the former file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Christian_M%C3%BChl%C3%A4user_mit_Volker_Bouffier.png I ask for deletion because all necessary information is now available.

Many Thanks
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:34, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 133 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. @LuBae: Haben Sie die Datei {{subst:OP}} wie in OTRS/de und COM:CONSENT angegeben markiert? Did you tag the file {{subst:OP}} as instructed at OTRS and COM:CONSENT?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:32, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: Sorry, der Hinweis {{subst:OP}} wurde leider vergessen und dann waren die Bilder gelöscht, bevor ich es setzen konnte. Mein Fehler. --LuBae (talk) 08:56, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, the note {{subst:OP}} was unfortunately forgotten and then the images were deleted before I could set it. My mistake.
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
@LuBae: Danke. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: Was passiert jetzt mit den Bildern? Einfach nur warten? Es sind schon mehr als zwei Monate vergangen seit der Löschung. / What happens to the pictures now? Just wait? More than two months have passed since the deletion. --LuBae (talk) 09:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
@LuBae: Ja, bitte warten Sie bis etwa 133 Tage nach dem 2018-07-10, derzeit voraussichtlich Ende November. Yes, please wait until about 133 days after 2018-07-10, currently projected about the end of November.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:05, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Oklahoma City National Memorial images

Ten years ago, most of the images at Category:Oklahoma City National Memorial were deleted as being derivative works of the (supposedly) copyrighted Oklahoma City Memorial. In the ten years since, that category has seen a number of uploads of photos of the "chair" memorial, example: File:Another shot of the empty chairs. - panoramio.jpg. So either the new images need to be deleted or the old ones need to be restored. My thought is that anything containing no more artistic elements than just the chairs is PD-ineligible and should be restored. Something like the nighttime display, e.g. File:OKC National Memorial chair reflection.jpg is a more arguable case. But IMO, any simple depictions of the chairs were wrongly decided ten years ago - the chairs are simple shapes and should themselves be considered PD-ineligible. --B (talk) 15:32, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Chris Richmond (2).jpg

There is an OTRS request Ticket:2018090410007552 for this directly from Chris Richmond himself. Please review it. Thank you SethT (talk) 17:33, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 133 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. @ConstantEditor126: Did you tag the file {{subst:OP}} as instructed at OTRS and COM:CONSENT? Also, please display your actual username in your signature to effectively enable pinging and mentioning.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:30, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Cotton Belt Rail Line Map.svg

This file is different enough from the original that I question whether it should be deleted as a derivative work. It is a map, after all, and maps will look similar. I formally request undeletion so we can bring the issue to DR, where the community can weigh in. I have already requested this from the deleting admin, but I've heard nothing back (Special:PermanentLink/318655244#File:Cotton Belt Rail Line Map.svg).

While technically I could undelete this myself and bring to DR, I believe that is a violation of process and community norms. That is why I'm making this request via the common channel.

Courtesy ping User:Túrelio. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:56, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose In my opinion your design is still very close to the original Dart map. E.g. you could have used a somewhat higher resolution for the city limits and different colours for the highways and city areas. Of course there will always be similarities when it comes to geographical maps but I think this is what would be called "close paraphrasing" in case of text works. Anyhow, I have temporarily undeleted the file so others may weigh in and compare the two designs. De728631 (talk) 16:12, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, I think the concept of dimmed secondary geographical features did not originate with DART, and this map is sufficiently different.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:23, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Saola 2017-10-28 0300Z.png

This file was deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Saola 2017-10-28 0300Z.png. NICT's terms of not allowing the use of non-commercials was the reason. However, this file came from the homepage of the Japan Meteorological Agency (http://www.jma.go.jp/jp/gms/smallc.html?area=0&element=1&time=201710290920), not NICT. The JMA Terms of Service allow commercial use and are written to be compatible with Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/kishou/info/coment.html). It seems that this file restoration is correct by this.--Y.haruo (talk) 08:50, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The original source is free per {{JMA}}. De728631 (talk) 12:02, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Sunhild Kleingaertner.jpg

To whom it may concern,

The picture Túrelio deleted because of copywright violation belongs to the user ("Leibniz-Institut für Maritime Geschichte"), who uploaded the file. You can find the picture easily on their website https://www.dsm.museum/ueber-uns/mitarbeitende/prof-dr-sunhild-kleingaertner/

So the user, who's my client, owns the website and the picture and should be able to upload it for free use on wikipedia properly. If relevant: The user just verified today, that he's practicing officially on wikipedia in order of the Leibniz-Institut für Maritime Geschichte.

Kind regards,

35c63n

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 35c63n (talk • contribs)
See my reply (in German) at User_talk:Túrelio#File:Sunhild_Kleingaertner.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 09:13, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Devi Basuli Temple at Nanoor, West Bengal.jpg

This picture is taken by me and also uploaded in my facebook page, there is no copyright violations.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Saikat.das.08 (talk • contribs)
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @Saikat.das.08: Please upload the original unmodified picture. Thanks, Yann (talk) 11:30, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Delphine-Manceau.jpg

This file belongs to NEOMA Business School. It is provided at other sites that talks about the school or Delphine Manceau. It is therefore normal to see it elsewhere but we are the owner of the photo. Thanks

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Simonibled (talk • contribs) 11:38, 6 September 2018‎ (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Please use Commons:OTRS to verify this. Thuresson (talk) 10:13, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Logo-beaux-villages.jpg

Please restore the logo of our association "Les plus beaux Villages de Suisse" as we registed it and have the right to use it. Thank you--Quattromonti (talk) 13:19, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose We have no direct means to verify that your Wikimedia account really represents this association. Therefore we need a permission by email coming from the copyright holder (please see COM:OTRS). Alternatively you could release the logo under a free licence at your website. This would actually be the fastest way to undelete the image here. De728631 (talk) 13:44, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Merci d'envoyer une autorisation via COM:OTRS/fr. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:46, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Team Secret Logo.png

File:Team Secret Logo to undelete.jpg

I am from Team Secret Management and we got the logo from our company folder. I didnt know which options to select so I just randomly selected

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjyena (talk • contribs) 15:13, 6 September 2018‎ (UTC)
  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:38, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @Wjyena, Asherio32: Sorry, the logo is probably too complex to be under TOO in the country of origin. Please have the logo designer, who is probably the copyright holder, send permission via OTRS with a copy to you. Do not reupload deleted content.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:38, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Corbie.jpg

Hello, As I m new here I m very slow to get the clue that how my file is deleted. I took the picture of the Logo of CoRBiE and Uploaded here. The logo belongs to our NGO CoRBiE. There is no copyright violation. I request you to Undelete the file back. Thank You.

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The logo has been published elsewhere without a free licence and we cannot verify your association with CorBiE through your Wikimedia account. Therefore we need a permission from the copyright holder by email. Please see COM:OTRS for details. De728631 (talk) 19:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:TatianaPoliektova.jpg

The author, "Timeflees - Filippo Rivetti Photography" has agreed to publish this image under any suitable license, so that "The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that the copyright holder is properly attributed. Redistribution, derivative work, commercial use, and all other use is permitted."

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Please ask Mr. Rivetti to send a permission by email via COM:OTRS. De728631 (talk) 19:15, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Author Lisa Dietlin with entrepreneur Stedman Graham.jpg

This is a photo of myself, Lisa M. Dietlin, taken by myself, at an event honoring myself, to promote the book I authored, Transformational Philanthropy, which is also shown in the photograph. Stedman Graham provided the Foreword for the book we are holding in the image. The image belongs on my Wikipedia page in support of my position as a noted author who is part of the larger Philanthropic community.

--Lisa Dietlin (talk) 18:23, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose If you are depicted in the photo standing clear of the camera, how is it that you took it yourself? In the deletion request your authorship was already doubted but you didn't provide any convincing arguments. De728631 (talk) 19:13, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:UP Big Boy 4014.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This was my own work and will be tagged appropriately. Morven (talk) 22:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Agree Thuresson (talk) 22:30, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pellerano Escudo.jpg

I wish to request undeletion for the file mentioned in subject since I've already sent permissions via email. --Mpellerano (talk) 00:23, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: When confirmed an OTRS agent will request undeletion and the file can be restored. Not before. --Majora (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Buddha Moises Pellerano.jpg

I wish to request undeletion for the file mentioned in subject since I've already sent permissions via email --Mpellerano (talk) 00:25, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: When confirmed an OTRS agent will request undeletion and the file can be restored. Not before. --Majora (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ANA Moises Pellerano.jpg

I wish to request undeletion for the file mentioned in subject since I've already sent permissions via email --Mpellerano (talk) 00:27, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: When confirmed an OTRS agent will request undeletion and the file can be restored. Not before. --Majora (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kinky Trans.jpg

I wish to request undeletion for the file mentioned in subject since I've already sent permissions via email --Mpellerano (talk) 00:28, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: When confirmed an OTRS agent will request undeletion and the file can be restored. Not before. --Majora (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rape Moises Pellerano.jpg

I wish to request undeletion for the file mentioned in subject since I've already sent permissions via email --Mpellerano (talk) 00:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: When confirmed an OTRS agent will request undeletion and the file can be restored. Not before. --Majora (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Playing Doctor.jpg

I wish to request undeletion for the file mentioned in subject since I've already sent permissions via email --Mpellerano (talk) 00:30, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: When confirmed an OTRS agent will request undeletion and the file can be restored. Not before. --Majora (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Acuarela Moises Pellerano.jpg

I wish to request undeletion for the file mentioned in subject since I've already sent permissions via email --Mpellerano (talk) 00:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: When confirmed an OTRS agent will request undeletion and the file can be restored. Not before. --Majora (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Moises Arturo Pellerano Miniño.jpg

I wish to request undeletion for the file mentioned in subject since I've already sent permissions via email --Mpellerano (talk) 00:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: When confirmed an OTRS agent will request undeletion and the file can be restored. Not before. --Majora (talk) 01:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:MapTiler - start screen.png

ticket:2018042010006308 contains valid permission, but I can't see the image and so cannot assess whether it was in scope. Some comments at the deletion request considered it out of scope, and it's unclear whether the DR closed as delete based on that rationale or the permission issue. Could an administrator take a look and undelete if this file appears to be plausibly in scope? Either way, please ping me upon a decision. ~ Rob13Talk 07:36, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

I'm gonna say that is not in scope, BU Rob13. The uploader appears to be an advert only account and minus a sandbox draft (en:User:Jiří Komárek (MapTiler team)/sandbox) I'm not really seeing any use for it. And the sandbox doesn't really mitigate the fact that the image was pretty blatant advertising for their company. --Majora (talk) 01:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Gotcha. I'll communicate that in the ticket. Thanks. ~ Rob13Talk 01:47, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Niira Radia - Chairman Nayati Healthcare.jpg

This is a free content and can be used by anyone.

Please undelete this and all the other images.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Contenteditor13 (talk • contribs) 11:51, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MapTiler - visual geolocation.png

Could this be temporarily undeleted for processing of ticket:2018042010006308 or could a copy be sent to my email? Thanks. ~ Rob13Talk 13:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: Undeleted for processing. --Majora (talk) 01:54, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

SVGs by User:ಪ್ರದೀಪ್ ಬೆಳಗಲ್

So called “dark patches” are most likely a trivial SVG 1.2 compatibility problem – see File:DNA chemical structure.svg #filehistory. The story happened when mass deletionist tendencies dominated on Commons, hence no wonder that nobody attempted to do a repair job. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:06, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:GC Chandrashekhar.jpg

Hi, 

  statement of permission has been sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org by GC Chandrashekhar

Aralikatte (talk) 14:39, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: When confirmed an OTRS agent will request undeletion and the file can be restored. Not before. --Majora (talk) 01:09, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Irene Sáez in Valencia 1990.jpg

This image was taken by my grandmother (Zoila Rubin) on March 2, 1990, in the Plaza Monumental of Valencia, the image was not published but it was saved and placed in a photo album. The image is not on any website nor does it have copyright.--LuisRiera Wiki97 (talk) 18:17, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Irene Sáez in Valencia 1990.jpg Thuresson (talk) 19:06, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Milos-Zlamal-1990.jpg

A valid OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2018031610005195.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and make sure that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can apply {{temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance. Face-smile.svg --Michal Lenc (talk) 20:12, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Michal Lenc: Please make the necessary changes. --Majora (talk) 01:01, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:PATRICIA PEÑALVER.jpg

Buenas noches,

Quería saber porque han eliminado el archivo PATRICIAPEÑALVER.jpg en dos ocasiones, la fotografía ha sido realizada por mi con el nombre artístico de Maykiso fotografía, en los metadatos del archivo se pueden ver mis datos y modelo de cámara etc Sony A77.

La modelo es la actriz Patricia Peñalver, mi hija y tengo su autorización. El archivo figura también en la pagína http://www.juegodedamas.com/patricia-penalver/ que es de la representante artística de la actriz, para la cual yo he cedido todas las fotografías.

Les ruego por favor que lo restauren a la mayor brevedad posible, o me indiquen la forma adecuada de insertar la fotografía en su página de wikipedia. Un saludo --Mayko producciones (talk) 21:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)-

Goodnight,

I wanted to know why they have deleted the file File:PATRICIA PEÑALVER.jpg twice, the photograph has been made by me with the artistic name of Maykiso photography, in the metadata of the file you can see my data and camera model etc. Sony A77.

The model is the actress Patricia Peñalver, my daughter and I have her authorization. The file also appears in the page http://www.juegodedamas.com/patricia-penalver/ that is of the artistic representative of the actress, for which I have given all the photographs.

Please, please restore it as soon as possible, or indicate the appropriate way to insert the photograph on your wikipedia page. a greeting
 
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:56, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Mt logo.png

I have submitted an article about the company and it's on review, I would request to please undelete it

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Prateekbtbl (talk • contribs) 02:11, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:23, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose as promotional, OOS.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:23, 8 September 2018 (UTC)


Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests&oldid=309920303"