requires a suitable scope! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:42, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Info Missing a : in the scope, sorry. --- Mdupont (talk) 18:52, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Support Shows dog in landscape of origin and with sheep. All criteria satisfied and best in scope. Walter Siegmund(talk) 21:38, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Oppose I think that this one shows better the characteristics of the race. Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:23, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Info this picture shows the dogs at work in natural habitat,should we change the scope to that? Sarplaninac at work? it would be an single image. 12:45, 19 December 2010 (UTC) This was from me --- Mdupont (talk) 07:59, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Support Habitat is very important here --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:12, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
Info I am changing to include the herd in the scope, because that is the important feature here. --Mdupont (talk) 10:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Support agree with this new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:56, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Comment I would support "Sarplaninac at work" as suggested in the unsigned info above. But I think it is best in scope for mainscope, too. Walter Siegmund(talk) 07:20, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Info I formatted the scope such that it is without the Category word. It is really confusing that several scopes are used for images competing in an MVR. I do not think scope changes should be made in an MVR. I propose we keep this wordign though because it matches an existing category, and the other image in the MVR is not eligible due to missing geotag. --Slaunger (talk) 22:15, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Support I agree with scope "Sarplaninac with Herd". Walter Siegmund(talk) 21:15, 30 January 2011 (UTC)