User talk:JuTa
Contents
Please Undelete[edit]
The file, "File:Quintino_Sebastiao_1990.jpg", is being used in the article https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quintino_Sebasti%C3%A3o, which refers to the sculptor portrayed in the deleted image. Please, undelete it. --Tmarisco (talk) 17:04, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
- No, because it is a copyright violation - see Commons:Licensing. We would need permission documented through Commons:OTRS from its copyright holder(s), which are in this case the photpgrapher and the artist of the depicted objects. regards. --JuTa 19:30, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
- The image is part of the personal collection of Quintino Sebastião and it was he who uploaded the file himself. In the description of the image, he had informed the origin of the image/file and the context. Even more, do you need more evidence? What should I or he do? Send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org? Is there an official document for these authorizations? Thank you. --Tmarisco (talk) 11:11, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- The photographer and Mr. Sebastião should send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. And then please be patient, the processing of ir could take weeks. regards. --JuTa 14:15, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- About the content of the email, what information should be included? Thank you. --Tmarisco (talk) 15:43, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- Please see Commons:Email templates. regards --JuTa 15:46, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- About the content of the email, what information should be included? Thank you. --Tmarisco (talk) 15:43, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- The photographer and Mr. Sebastião should send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. And then please be patient, the processing of ir could take weeks. regards. --JuTa 14:15, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- The image is part of the personal collection of Quintino Sebastião and it was he who uploaded the file himself. In the description of the image, he had informed the origin of the image/file and the context. Even more, do you need more evidence? What should I or he do? Send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org? Is there an official document for these authorizations? Thank you. --Tmarisco (talk) 11:11, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
File:P204.png[edit]
|
File:P204.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Cjp24 (talk) 03:01, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Rekman_Seller.png[edit]
Hello
I've tagged file:Rekman_Seller.png as no permission, but apparently something went wrong while you've removed the tags. What did I missed?
That picture, like all other imports from that user about Rekman Seller are clearly professional photo shoots (as explained by the importer on the matching French Wikipedia article) without any clear authorization.
Thank you for your help!
Trizek from FR 09:20, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Trizek, anyhow it seems you added {{subst:no permission since}}. You should add {{subst:npd}}. --JuTa 10:25, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you.
- Templates can sometimes be confusing: I've added a reminder to my userpage.
- Trizek from FR 12:53, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- Also user:Ben.chazal has been warned multiple times about importing non free contents (last time in March). Can you consider a block of their account? That would also help me to curate the article on fr.wp. Thanks, Trizek from FR 12:56, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
About File:Luna Shamsuddoha at office (1).jpg photo[edit]
Dear Juta, Got a notification from you about Luna Shamsuddoha photos. I uploaded those photo April 18 and the author sends mail to OTRS on July 3. The author K.A.Hossain Tareque send mail from his mail. Can you please check again? Or can I forward the mail again? NC Hasive • talk • 10:16, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Hasive, then you should add the template {{OTRS pending}} with the fitting date parameters to its description pages. --JuTa 10:24, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
The question[edit]
Hello JuTa. Delete it. CalalC99 (talk) 16:50, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Done --Please restore[edit]
This cat:
-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:26, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Also, Category:Number 9049 on vehicles is suddenly showing in my watchlist as newly created by someone else, meaning that it was deleted before. Can you please undelete its previous revisions? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:11, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Sefer-Hamiddot-Haqazzar-MS-Warsaw-text.pdf[edit]
Hi, as per our previous conversation in July, please remove the license review tag from this file. Dovi (talk) 20:59, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
- Which conversation? I cant remember. --JuTa 22:39, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
On second thought, since File:00 SMQ MS-Q Warsaw258 transcription.pdf is nothing more than a redundant and outdated copy of the updated File:Sefer-Hamiddot-Haqazzar-MS-Warsaw-text.pdf, could you simply delete the former for me (leaving a "redirect" tag)? Thanks, Dovi (talk) 03:28, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Then we need a license check or a verification through Commons:OTRS. Either the entire work id old enoght to be pblic domain, or not. And if not the external source needs to be verified. (A google link doesnt indicate own work normaly).--JuTa 03:32, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- We already went through this is July! This is my own work, based on a public domain work. There is no missing license. And it is from online material that already contains a clear CC license. Dovi (talk) 03:38, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- I cannot see the source, because there is a login-wall before. That is the reason why I set the license review template in first place. You dont liked it, So please confirm your ownerhip by Commons:OTRS. --JuTa 06:21, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- We already went through this is July! This is my own work, based on a public domain work. There is no missing license. And it is from online material that already contains a clear CC license. Dovi (talk) 03:38, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Then we need a license check or a verification through Commons:OTRS. Either the entire work id old enoght to be pblic domain, or not. And if not the external source needs to be verified. (A google link doesnt indicate own work normaly).--JuTa 03:32, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Serbian Armed Forces[edit]
I already explained many times to other people in here. I got these pictures from vs.rs And I have approval, see here http://www.vs.rs/en/terms-conditions
- Then please add the corresponding license template to the files description pages - compare Commons:Licensing and Commons:Copyright tags. --JuTa 17:41, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Sorting of new surname categories[edit]
Hi JuTa, follow-up on empty surname category discussion. I finally built this list of new surname cat requiring special categories. I would appreciate your comments, in particular regarding:
- Previously created categories that appear to be missing, such as Category:Achútegui (surname);
- Whether or not we should create "intermediate surname categories", such as Category:Yrjö (surname), that is needed to properly categorize Category:Yrjö-Koskinen (surname) as [[Category:Yrjö (surname)|Yrjo]] [[Category:Koskinen (surname)]].
Any other comment is welcome.
On a separate topic, there is a need to clarify handling of nobiliary particles, such as (amongst others):
Af af Al Ben Da Dal dal de De Del del Della Dello den Den der des Di di dos Du du El La la Le le Mac O St Van van Von von
In some cases intermediate surname categories were created Category:St (surname) or Category:Van (surname)... IMO these are confusing more than helpful. Again, I would appreciate your opinion.
-- Laddo (talk) 00:48, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Laddo,
- Umlauts and other special characters should be sorted as their "normal" character. So your list looks fine.
- The Achútegui: The commons name of this person seemed to be without the special character. So I corrected that.
- Double names should be placed under their single names sorted with a space at the beginning: So the content of Category:Yrjö-Koskinen (surname) should be [[Category:Yrjö (surname)| Yrjo-Koskinen]] [[Category:Koskinen (surname)|| Yrjo-Koskinen]].
- Nobiliary particles should not be taken in account. If you find such, please correct the wikidata items. For the "Af" thing. It wasnt clear for me that this seems to be the swedish version of "of". I'll will correct them soon.
- About Category:Van (surname): There is minimum Lindey which just this name and its port of some vietnamese names not being a nobiliary particles.
- The "St" or the "La" or "Le" surname cats are a compromize solution to be able to follow "rule 3" even in those cases. These are surnames containing multiple words and any other got splitted . So I splitted these too.
