User talk:Moheen
“ |
For millions of years mankind lived just like the animals |
” |
—David Gilmour, Richard Wright and Polly Samson, Keep Talking |
This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.
This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Moheen. |
This is the user talk page of Moheen, where you can send messages and comments to Moheen. |
|
|
|
Contents
- 1 Jennifer French
- 2 Quality Image Promotion
- 3 Valued Image Promotion
- 4 Deletion of Carl Benjamin, 2016.jpg
- 5 Recently deleted article due to copyright
- 6 Deletion of File:Britain for Europe Logo.jpg
- 7 Valued Image Promotion
- 8 FP Promotion
- 9 Quality Image Promotion
- 10 Deletion of Edie Brickell image - improperly done?
- 11 Quality Image Promotion
- 12 Notification about possible deletion
- 13 Please check the file
- 14 Notification about possible deletion
- 15 Valued Image Promotion
- 16 Quality Image Promotion
- 17 Quality Image Promotion
- 18 Valued Image Promotion
- 19 Quality Image Promotion
- 20 Valued Image Promotion
- 21 File:Kareena_UNICEF14.jpg
- 22 Valued Image Promotion
- 23 Quality Image Promotion
- 24 File:Christendom Wins 2017 NSCRO Rugby National Championship.jpg
- 25 Valued Image Promotion
- 26 Quality Image Promotion
- 27 Valued Image Promotion
- 28 suppression de fichier
- 29 Deletion of Commons:File:Shawn Andrews (actor).png
- 30 File:Grupo_Desportivo_Águias_de_Camarate.png
- 31 What the frick!
- 32 Valued Image Promotion
- 33 Valued Image Promotion
- 34 CA removal
- 35 Quality Image Promotion
- 36 Quality Image Promotion
- 37 মেটা-ডাটা না থাকলে করণীয়
- 38 Valued Image Promotion
- 39 Valued Image Promotion
- 40 Valued Image Promotion
Jennifer French[edit]
Could you please clarify how File:Jennifer French Headshot 2018.jpg is a copyright violation if File:Jennifer French at Alpha-One.jpg, the photo it was cropped from, isn't? There's been an ongoing edit war on French's article because some people feel that the "Alpha-One" photo isn't appropriately reflective of her role as an MPP — but if a photo has been uploaded here as CC/own work, then cropping it to remove the parts of the photo that are leading editors to get into a war over it has to be on the menu of allowable options. CC permits derivatives of CC work, so there's no way the cropped photo can be deemed a copyright violation if the original photo isn't. Bearcat (talk) 17:41, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, never mind. I didn't notice that somebody had tried to replace the cropped headshot with a different upload that was a copyright violation, and that the cropped headshot is still on Commons. Sorry for the confusion. Bearcat (talk) 17:44, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- To Bearcat et al, we represent the office of this politician with me specifically being the Chief of Staff. We have been attempting to update this photo with her most recent headshot for weeks, with apparent copyright violations of what is our owned property that we want to release freely onto this Wikipedia article. Can either of you elaborate as to what we’re doing wrong? Thank you JeepRhyme (talk) 22:13, 24 June 2018 (EDT)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Armin Steigenberger at East Delta University (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Armin Steigenberger at East Delta University (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Helena Hill Weed.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Eva Le Gallienne.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Deletion of Carl Benjamin, 2016.jpg[edit]
Regarding your deletion of File:Carl Benjamin, 2016.jpg, it might have had a wrong rationale, I don't know about that, but it was not a copyright violation. It is covered by {{YouTube CC-BY}}. Wumbolo (talk) 07:48, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Wumbolo: It was uploaded by {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} tag. So, I restored this, you can proceed. ~Moheen (keep talking) 08:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Recently deleted article due to copyright[edit]
Hello, One of my images of a LEGO set and box were removed because of copyright. I'm assuming this is because LEGO boxes are not allowed to be uploaded because they are not public domain? I just want to make sure what the rules are as another image I uploaded of just the set was allowed to stay, and I don't want to inadvertently upload more copyrighted or not public domain material. Thanks, Fritzmann2002 (talk) 16:35, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Deletion of File:Britain for Europe Logo.jpg[edit]
Can you tell me why was this deleted? It is a fair use of a campaign logo. Shouldn't I have been notified that there was a discussion about it? --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 00:01, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- @The Vintage Feminist: I have started a discussion. ~Moheen (keep talking) 03:44, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Maude Adams.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
FP Promotion[edit]
The image File:Swing into books, Book week, November 1-7, 1964.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Swing into books, Book week, November 1-7, 1964.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
![]() |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Armin Steigenberger at East Delta University (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Deletion of Edie Brickell image - improperly done?[edit]
Can you tell me why the image of Edie Brickell was deleted? The owner of the image gave full permission for the picture to be used for any purpose. Was it the belief that the editor of the image was falsely claiming to have ownership permission, or was there a rush to judgment, or are there rules that says that even if an owner gives permission, a photo cannot be posted in Wikimedia Commons if... (fill in the blank, because I am at a loss why)? Mburrell (talk) 16:20, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Mburrell: Lets go with DR. ~Moheen (keep talking) 17:08, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- When I visited the image page after a deletion proposal was posted on the Edie Brickell talk page, I saw that the poster had made several edits, such as removing listing of Instagram as a source and listing the photographer and calling it out as owner supplied, stating that the poster talked to the owner and updated the legal permissions on the page. After there was a deletion request, the poster jumped through some hoops (or falsely edited the page to say it was done, that I don't know) and then the image was deleted based on the original request and not on what was stated on the image page. When I visited the image page, the original editor had deleted the deletion warning template, so the link you provided is the first I saw of the deletion request page, which I tried to get to. My mistake was when going through the edit history of the image page, not clicking the button on the deletion template that was available in edit history. However, I still think the image was deleted in haste and should be discussed to determine if the poster had permission from the owner, or just typed whatever looked good. Is the image permanently gone, or in Wiki-purgatory? Can a discussion be started? How can one investigate actual permissions? Is this a lessons-learned for next time? Mburrell (talk) 18:30, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Bistaar Arts Complex, sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Amy (8325722008).jpg
- File:Courtney (model) 11.jpg
- File:Courtney (model) 3.jpg
- File:Courtney (model) 5.jpg
- File:Courtney (model) 9.jpg
- File:Elizabeth (15951480837).jpg
- File:Emma (14757726264).jpg
- File:Emma (15159030666).jpg
- File:Emma (15280381533).jpg
- File:Emma (15755661795).jpg
- File:Emma (16066216678).jpg
- File:Fingertips (15193795353).jpg
- File:For The Love Of Light (21845670394).jpg
- File:From the Other Side (15178053353).jpg
- File:Gemma (19814967100).jpg
- File:Gemma (8172703449).jpg
- File:Georgina Anneliese (15789770648).jpg
- File:Hanna (16159241198).jpg
- File:Hannah (15744070383).jpg
- File:Hannah (16187418189).jpg
- File:Jo Louise (21247600920).jpg
- File:Jo-Louise (15619448688).jpg
- File:Jo-Louise (15691807357).jpg
- File:Jo-Louise (16205316216).jpg
- File:Jo-Louise (19586443758).jpg
- File:Jo-Louise (19619014330).jpg
- File:Jo-Louise (19797046042).jpg
- File:Jo-Louise (20228491101).jpg
- File:Jo-Louise (20233239486).jpg
- File:Karolina (16470934772).jpg
- File:Kristina (20009127710).jpg
- File:Kristina (20221479352).jpg
- File:Lake Placid (16145154600).jpg
- File:Laying in Wait (15806309413).jpg
- File:Lyme Regis (20254149496).jpg
- File:Mollie (15329269391).jpg
- File:Near Cerne Abbas (18239208839).jpg
- File:Near Cerne Abbas (18417647749).jpg
- File:Only Fingertips (15822250212).jpg
- File:Roseanne (7415379842).jpg
- File:Rosie (14348490086).jpg
- File:Rosie (14895674806).jpg
- File:Rosie Robinson (14498766363).jpg
- File:Rosie Robinson (15951676316).jpg
- File:Rosie Robinson (16409947793).jpg
- File:Rosie Robinson (16840886790).jpg
- File:Rosie Robinson (19557891608).jpg
- File:Rosie Robinson (19979392721).jpg
- File:Softer Than Silk (15887173786).jpg
- File:Sunday Morning (22123122933).jpg
- File:The Outside Looking In (15414554654).jpg
- File:The Portal Back In Time That Is Corfe Station (20971625750).jpg
- File:Unusual Perspective (15696955187).jpg
- File:Window Flower (16209673537).jpg
Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 14:18, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Please check the file[edit]
Please once have a look at a file File:Pragya jaiswal at IIFA Utsavam.jpg
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Boat Ride (20294655986).jpg
- File:Dariabanda, Rural Games of Bangladesh (9960939943).jpg
- File:Dark side of the sun (7989577499).jpg
- File:Eching Beching, Childhood Games (9961647606).jpg
- File:Eching Beching, Rural Games of Bangladesh (9960817503).jpg
- File:Known face (8651223540).jpg
- File:Mysterious Island in Bangladesh (20134446029).jpg
- File:Pahela Baishakh costumes (8693805564).jpg
- File:Pohela Falgun (16623454072).jpg
- File:River Grabbing (8397493417).jpg
- File:Street shop (8395957882).jpg
- File:Unidentified location of Bangladesh (13625731955).jpg
- File:Unidentified river of Bangladesh (20312544802).jpg
- File:Waiting for passenger (20132890710).jpg
- File:Without Rudder (20132905970).jpg
Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:39, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
deletion of movie poster[edit]
hey, permission is underway via the ORST permission system via the original copyright holder - the statement mail will arrive in the next few days
Hanzone (talk) 19:12, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of Meher Afroz Shaon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Backyard, Maximum Security Prison, Robben Island (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Window, Maximum Security Prison, Robben Island (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Wash basins, Maximum Security Prison, Robben Island (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Maximum Security Prison, Robben Island (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Robbene Iland, Portal (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Robben Island Maximum Security Prison, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Communal toilets, Maximum Security Prison, Robben Island (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Communal toilets, Maximum Security Prison, Robben Island (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Robben Island Primary School, front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
File:Kareena_UNICEF14.jpg[edit]
Hello, I was asked by Túrelio to discuss this matter with you. The following image was tagged by you for deletion stating that it was a "screenshot, wallpaper or promotional poster". I'm just a little confused as the image was taken at a UNICEF event in India by a Bollywood Hungama photographer. I was the main editor who was responsible for talking to Bollywood Hungama and in the end we obtained this license. I haven't had a problem with any of the pictures I have uploaded so far. Please explain. Thanks -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 03:29, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- @BOLLYWOOD DREAMZ: Bollywood Hungama grants permission to copy from a Bollywood party or event in India; here this imagecom/news/features/kareena-kapoor-launches-child-friendly-schools-for-unicef/ image] was taken from "news/features/" category. So this permission does not extend. Thanks. ~Moheen (keep talking) 03:44, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Communal toilets, Robben Island Maximum Security Prison.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Section B courtyard, Robben Island Maximum Security Prison, west-east axis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Biplab Anand at Wikimania 2018 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Christendom Wins 2017 NSCRO Rugby National Championship.jpg[edit]
Moheen Reeyad, I just restored a file you very recently deleted, File:Christendom Wins 2017 NSCRO Rugby National Championship.jpg. That file was temporarily undeleted in order that OTRS could verify permission provided with Ticket:2018080710010535. See Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Christendom_Wins_2017_NSCRO_Rugby_National_Championship.jpg. OTRS hasn't indicated at COM:UNDEL that they've had a chance to look at the temporarily undeleted file, so you'd be doing me a favor if you don't delete it again. Thanks. —RP88 (talk) 16:16, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Unless, of course, you deleted it for having failed an OTRS permission check? If so please leave a note at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Christendom_Wins_2017_NSCRO_Rugby_National_Championship.jpg. —RP88 (talk) 16:19, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Welcome sign, Boulders Penguin Colony.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Govinda Gunalanker Hostel at University of Chittagong (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Section B, Robben Island Maximum Security Prison, back, north-south exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
suppression de fichier[edit]
Bonjour, tu as supprimé ce fichier File:Qui va gagner le pompon Op 2818m.jpg, mais je suis l'auteur donc j'ai le droit d'importer cette image sur Commons. Merci de la recréer.--Macassar (talk) 10:11, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Macassar: This file was a copyright violation for the following reason: Online comic, not own work. Êtes-vous sûr d'avoir le copyright? ~Moheen (keep talking) 10:28, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Deletion of Commons:File:Shawn Andrews (actor).png[edit]
Hello, you deleted my file. Please put it back. An email to OTRS was already sent and it is currently pending OTRS, thank you. See here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Shawn_Andrews_(actor) Reriksenus (talk) 15:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Reriksenus: Could you put the OTRS ticket number here? ~Moheen (keep talking) 15:53, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Moheen Reeyad: Here it is Ticket#: 2018081310000794 Please let me know if I did something wrong and how I can do it better next time Reriksenus (talk) 17:22, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Grupo_Desportivo_Águias_de_Camarate.png[edit]
Hi, I notice that you deleted the logo of a football club. I followed every rule and tried to upload it just like all the other football clubs did in their wikipedia pages. Like: "https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_Madrid_Club_de_F%C3%BAtbol" and "https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sport_Lisboa_e_Benfica". So if you deleted it can you please help me get it back up again or undelete it? --Daniel AR Pires (talk) 15:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
What the frick![edit]
I got the wiggy iffy uh png on my page and you removed themm what the HECK! Why did you do that i am so upset because that is vandalism to my page. ggrrrrrrrrrrrr
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coin-operated binocular, Cape of Good Hope.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Africa Cafe, front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
CA removal[edit]
Hi Moheen, do you have the RAW file for File:120-130, Chiappini Street, Bo-Kaap (01).jpg available? I guess, I could try to remove the CA from the JPG, but doing it in Raw is easier and insures better quality. You could upload the RAW file to https://commonsarchive.wmflabs.org/wiki/Main_Page. Cheers. --MB-one (talk) 09:32, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Chiappini Street, Bo-Kaap (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! 73, Chiappini Street, Bo-Kaap (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! The Bo-Kaap Heritage Mural by Nasser Palangi, 93 Wale Street, Bo-Kaap (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! The Africa Cafe, Cape Town City Centre (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★Congratulations! Pankaj Deo at Wikimania 2018 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
মেটা-ডাটা না থাকলে করণীয়[edit]
Moheen ভাই, কিছু ছবিতে কোন মেটা-ডাটা থাকছে না, কোনটায় থাকলেও অ-সংলগ্ন কিছু লেখা থাকে। এসব ছবির ক্ষেত্রে করণীয় কি? যেমনঃ এখানে এখানে Mmrsafy (talk) 09:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Mmrsafy: আপাতত Images from WLM 2018 in Bangladesh missing exif metadata-এ যুক্ত করে রাখুন। ~MOHEEN (keep talking) 10:15, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chiappini Street, Cape Town (NE-SW axis) .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wale Street, Cape Town, (NE-SW axis) .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15-37 Pentz Street, Cape Town (north-south axis).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sri Sri Sita Temple (west exposure) .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sri Sri Sita Temple (east-west exposure) .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chauchala Chhota Govinda Mandir, eastern facade .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.