User talk:Rodhullandemu
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Street, Liverpool - No. 4.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Street, Liverpool - No. 8.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Street, Liverpool - No. 3.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Street, Liverpool - No. 5.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Street, Liverpool - No. 7.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Royal School for the Blind, Hardman Street.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Liverpool College of Art.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mornington Terrace, Liverpool.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mackenzie Monument, Liverpool.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Arkles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hillsborough Memorial on 96 Avenue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bill Shankly statue at Anfield.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stanley Park bandstand, Liverpool.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
60 Hope Street, Liverpool.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Isla Gladstone Conservatory, Stanley Park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pavilion at west end of screen wall, Stanley Park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Terrace in Stanley Park, Liverpool.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Contents
Edinburgh Water Company[edit]
Can you please explain the logic for removing pictures of the assets of Edinburgh Water Company from the category:Edinburgh Water Company. The "Commons has media related to Edinburgh Water Company" link on the wikipedia article no longer works sensibly, because there are no pictures. Bob1960evens (talk) 12:48, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Bob1960evens: The individual images are in categories already categorised with Edinburgh Water Company and therefore inherit that category implicitly. To have them in both is a breach of COM:OVERCAT. I've added the link to the en:WP article to the category for you, but Commonscat links to categories, not images (the clue's in the name). Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:43, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation. They were not over-categorised when I added them, because Category:Loganlea Reservoir was not a member of Category:Edinburgh Water Company at the time, but the fact that you altered Category:Loganlea Reservoir created what I thought was a problem. Bob1960evens (talk) 08:06, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
File:JohnGeorgeHaigh.jpg[edit]
|
File:JohnGeorgeHaigh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
SchroCat (talk) 16:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Did you know..[edit]
..that the editor above dodged a bullet by edit conflict. Quite impressive in a way, really. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:29, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, he's now of no consequence to me and might show a modicum of grace and humility by withdrawing his nomination. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:31, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed, his findings may have allowed him to dodge some sharp words of mine, but the way he presented them is everything but collegial. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:09, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Street, Liverpool - No. 4.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Support Useful & used --
Comment Agreed, although an image without the car in front of the building would be preferred. If such an image could be obtained, it would immediately supercede this one.--
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Street, Liverpool - No. 8.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Street, Liverpool - No. 3.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Street, Liverpool - No. 5.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Street, Liverpool - No. 7.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Royal School for the Blind, Hardman Street.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Liverpool College of Art.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mornington Terrace, Liverpool.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mackenzie Monument, Liverpool.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Indefinite protection[edit]
Hello again.
Where the protection policy encourages indefinite protection of such pages as File:Cheng Tzu-tsai and Peter Huang 2018-01-13.jpg (hist • logs • abuse log)? Or can you perhaps point to some discussion where similar actions enjoyed a broad community support? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:37, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- Indefinite protection does not mear "forever". It really means "for an unspecified period". I'm quite prepared to drop it down when this persistent uploader (who is a sockmaster with no fewer than 47 socks) appears to have got the message. Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:28, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- Which message? The uploader is de facto banned from the site. It was namely the last upload which caused the sock to be quickly detected. If he’d been forced to use another filename, then detection would be more complicated. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:34, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- I don't want to give out any clues but my experience tells me that persistent vandals and their socks will stop trying to do what they want to achieve when they are no longer able to do so. IMO, any move that helps to achieve this is a bonus. Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:46, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- Which message? The uploader is de facto banned from the site. It was namely the last upload which caused the sock to be quickly detected. If he’d been forced to use another filename, then detection would be more complicated. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:34, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Arkles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hillsborough Memorial on 96 Avenue.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bill Shankly statue at Anfield.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stanley Park bandstand, Liverpool.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Valued Image Promotion[edit]
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
60 Hope Street, Liverpool.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Isla Gladstone Conservatory, Stanley Park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pavilion at west end of screen wall, Stanley Park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Terrace in Stanley Park, Liverpool.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
