User talk:Svajcr
 First steps tutorialOur first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.  Getting helpMore information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
 Goodies, tips and tricks
 Made a mistake?
| |
| (P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) | ||
Filnik 07:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Contents
- 1 File:Adolf Zika 02.jpg
- 2 Image:071111 Jesenice kaple na Plzenske ulici.JPG
- 3 Image:051027 Rybolov Jesenice 0010.JPG
- 4 Image:6x10 Profile.png and others
- 5 Image:Protagoras.jpg
- 6 File:William burroughs at richard avedon exhibit at corcoran.jpg
- 7 File:Springs alice 1987 helmut newton à monte carlo fb.jpg
- 8 File:MG_7812.jpg
- 9 File:Kratky frantsiek Kotor, 1898, polovina stereofotografie.jpg
- 10 File tagging File:Jan Sagl 1.jpg
- 11 File:020911 Praha Corbijn 0042.JPG
- 12 Tip: Categorizing images
- 13 File:080628_Vystava_alive_Praha_0008.JPG
- 14 File tagging File:020911_Praha_Corbijn_0050.JPG
- 15 File:Sculpture of a Sailor and His Girl.jpg
- 16 File:Talbot lace.jpg
- 17 File:Spencer Platt High line.jpg
- 18 File:Henri_Cartier-Bresson.jpg
- 19 File:World-press-2008.jpg
- 20 File:FELDMANN.jpg
- 21 File:Hippolyte Bayard Molinos Montmartre c.1842.jpg
- 22 Defaultsort
- 23 Deprecated License
- 24 File:Winston Churchill 1941 photo by Yousuf Karsh.jpg
- 25 File tagging Category:Jiří Růžek
- 26 File tagging File:Jiriruzek net 2010 Vinohrady.jpg
- 27 You should know...
- 28 Jan Tomáš
- 29 Thanks
- 30 File tagging File:Photo_comics_Night_Zero_P14.jpg
- 31 File:Carroll, Die Rossettis.jpg
- 32 File:1998книгаAvoir_20.jpg
- 33 File:Книга_Mparis2002.jpg
- 34 File:Скамейки-_трансформация_для_будущего.jpg
- 35 Copyright
- 36 File:Рожденные_в_СССРIgor_Moukhin.jpg
- 37 File:Журнал_Garcusa.jpg
- 38 File:PetrMamonov1989.jpg
- 39 File:DeMeyerMarylin.Miller.jpg
- 40 File:Carroll,_Die_Rossettis.jpg
- 41 Chybný údaj
- 42 File:Martincreednothing1997_2.jpg
- 43 Uvolňování přes OTRS
- 44 DMCA takedown
- 45 File:Midgley.jpg
- 46 File:Artists_dining_outdoors_at_Mt._Kisco_1912.jpg
- 47 File:Flyb.jpg
- 48 Available light
- 49 File:Oliviero_Toscani_International_Journalism_Festival_4.jpg
- 50 File:Flyb.jpg
- 51 File:Nyc-times-square1997.jpg
- 52 Davidman
- 53 Categorizing files
- 54 File tagging File:PennyWolinAge10.jpg
- 55 File tagging File:Иллюстрация из Risse im Patriarchat 4.jpg
- 56 Category:Charles_E._Brown
- 57 File:Per.huttner.Installation.RKIS.jpg
- 58 File:PeterLik.jpg
- 59 Photographic studio categorisation
- 60 Tono Stano
- 61 Problem with OTRS templates
- 62 File:Bernd and Hilla Becher, Met Museum, New York.jpg
- 63 File:Eds bridge.jpg
- 64 File:396 mikhailov moments1.jpg
- 65 File tagging File:Yuridojcportrait.jpg
- 66 File tagging File:Southern poster.jpg
- 67 File source is not properly indicated: File:Tsagolov bantits clash.JPG
- 68 Brassaï
- 69 File:Newton's bar.jpg
- 70 File:Sex and Landscapes.jpg
- 71 Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!
- 72 File:Robert Mapplethorpe exhibition 2.jpg
- 73 Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
- 74 File:GavinSimonds.jpg
- 75 File:Atelier de mécanique - 4.jpg
- 76 Díky!
- 77 Category:Ivan Sedliský
- 78 File tagging File:Nadia Rovderova portret triptych.jpg
- 79 Category:Lightbox
- 80 Copyright status: File:The Philadelphia Dance Company.jpg
- 81 Copyright status: File:Paul Taylor Dance Company.jpg
- 82 File source is not properly indicated: File:Lewis Carroll (the Reverend Charles Lutwidge Dodgson) Margaret Frances Langton Clarke, 1864.jpg
- 83 Category:Immagine_&_poesia
- 84 File:Najib Albina Photo Lab.jpg
- 85 File:ARIANA & GERARDO TRASH THE DRESS 2.jpg
- 86 File:EF TTD 229 Web (Trash the Dress).jpg
- 87 Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.
- 88 Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!
- 89 Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
- 90 Commons:Photo challenge/2014 - January - A bunch of stuff
- 91 Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
- 92 Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
- 93 File:Augusto De Luca e Carla Fracci .jpg
- 94 File:Augusto De Luca fotografa Carla Fracci - 1.jpg
- 95 File:Augusto De Luca fotografa Carla Fracci - 2.jpg
- 96 File:Augusto De Luca fotografa Carla Fracci - 3.jpg
- 97 File:Augusto De Luca fotografa Carla Fracci - 4.jpg
- 98 File:Стороны збручского идола.jpg
- 99 File:Стороны збручского идола.jpg
- 100 File:Vanessa Beecroft, Blonde Figure Lying, 2008.jpg
- 101 File tagging File:Jim Rakete Geno Lechner.jpg
- 102 File:František Dostál Vrsovice 1965-1989 (10).tif
- 103 File:Irving penn portrait.jpg
- 104 File:Secondo-Pia.jpg
- 105 File:Bayard, Hippolyte 1801-1887 - Selfportrait as a Drowned man 1840 b.jpg
- 106 File:Noah Kalina workshop 8.jpg
- 107 Notification about possible deletion
- 108 File:130425 Praha Prague Photo festival 0164.JPG
- 109 File:130425 Praha Prague Photo festival 0164.JPG
- 110 File:Bayard, Hippolyte 1801-1887 - Selfportrait as a Drowned man 1840 b.jpg
- 111 File:Presentación World Press Photo 2011.jpg
- 112 Notification about possible deletion
- 113 Category:Aphelandra_roezlii
- 114 File tagging File:Mnouriprt1977.jpg
- 115 File:Green791-Edit.jpg
- 116 File:Rodchenko.jpg
- 117 File:Rodchenko.jpg
File:Adolf Zika 02.jpg[edit]
Ahoj, chtěla bych poprosit jménem Adolfa Ziky o smazání této fotky, neboť na ní má práva a s jejím zveřejněním nesouhlasí. Děkuji a přeji hezký den. Zipo~commonswiki
Image:071111 Jesenice kaple na Plzenske ulici.JPG[edit]
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:051027 Rybolov Jesenice 0010.JPG[edit]
Hi Svajcr. This image is a great image which we would like to use in WikiPoject Fishing. However, at the moment it is useless, because you have provided no description. Could you either delete the image, or, much better, explain briefly what is going on - what fish they are after, and what method and tools they are using. Thanks. --Geronimo20 06:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Image:6x10 Profile.png and others[edit]
Please use the right cats! Here for example Category:Architectural element drawings. Thanks! TomAlt (talk) 17:49, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Image:Protagoras.jpg[edit]
| Pay attention to copyright | Image:Protagoras.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
-Wikipeder (talk) 09:48, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi Svajcr,
please stop uploading Flickr images that are licensed NC and/or ND. They are not allowed on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 18:03, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you, stopped, understand - NC = noncommercial. Sorry.--Svajcr (talk) 18:14, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
File:William burroughs at richard avedon exhibit at corcoran.jpg[edit]
| Critically evaluate Flickr licenses | File:William burroughs at richard avedon exhibit at corcoran.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.
Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters.
|
-Brynn (talk!) 13:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
File:Springs alice 1987 helmut newton à monte carlo fb.jpg[edit]
| Critically evaluate Flickr licenses | File:Springs alice 1987 helmut newton à monte carlo fb.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.
Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters.
|
-
All of the following are also copyright violations on flickr
- File:Jimmy carter at richard avedon exhibit at corcoran.jpg
- File:Helmut Newton.jpg
- File:Helmut Newton 22.jpg
- File:Chicago seven at richard avedon exhibit at corcoran.jpg
- File:Avedon jump.jpg
- File:Avedon in Berlin.jpg
Keep in mind when choosing photos to upload to Commons from flickr that many photos on flickr have an invalid copyright license, as the person who uploaded the photo there has simply taken a photo of a work created and copyrighted by another individual (in this case Richard Avedon and Helmut Newton). This photographing of another's photos does not create a new, valid copyright, so those photos are copyright violoations that infringe on Avedon's and Newton's rights. Use a critical eye when choosing photos on flickr. If the person who owns the flickr photostream did not actually author the original photo, they do not own the copyright. If you have questions, please feel free to leave a note on my talk page. Cheers! Brynn (talk!) 14:09, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hallo, thank you for all your messages!
... the photographing of another's photos does not create a new, valid copyright... This not a hardcopy of master´s photo, but this is the photo from the photo-exhibition!!! This is not copy of the photo, this is just document from the exhibition.
What is the different between pictures File:Avedon in Berlin 3056857210 194af1fb48 b.jpg and File:Avedon in Berlin.jpg ([1])?
File:MG_7812.jpg[edit]
| File deletion warning | File:MG_7812.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Abigor talk 11:08, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 |
Image:Unknown Weegee at Palazzo della Ragione in Milan.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Trixt (talk) 01:08, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
|
| This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Weegee_at_Palazzo_della_Ragione_in_Milan.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
MBisanz talk 02:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
File:Kratky frantsiek Kotor, 1898, polovina stereofotografie.jpg[edit]
Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
- Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
- State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
- If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
- Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
- Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.
If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.
It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.
You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.
Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.
Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:16, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Jan Sagl 1.jpg[edit]
|
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Jan Sagl 1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jan Sagl 1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Týká se také File:Jan Sagl 2.jpg File:Jan Sagl 3.jpgFile:Jan Sagl 4.jpg. Zirland (talk) 10:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
File:020911 Praha Corbijn 0042.JPG[edit]
|
File:020911 Praha Corbijn 0042.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
I wanted to let you know that this and several similar photos have been tagged as copyright violations, presumably because the primary subject, i.e. the artwork itself, is copyrighted. Wknight94 talk 16:10, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
- [[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
- [[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
- [[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:22, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Samuel J. Miller Frederick Douglass, 1847-52.jpg was uncategorized on 11 August 2009.
- Image:Martincreednothing1997 2.jpg was uncategorized on 15 November 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:27, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
File:080628_Vystava_alive_Praha_0008.JPG[edit]
|
File:080628_Vystava_alive_Praha_0008.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Pruneautalk 14:21, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:020911_Praha_Corbijn_0050.JPG[edit]
|
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:020911_Praha_Corbijn_0050.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:020911_Praha_Corbijn_0050.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ciell (talk) 20:20, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
File:Sculpture of a Sailor and His Girl.jpg[edit]
|
File:Sculpture of a Sailor and His Girl.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Justass (talk) 13:24, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Talbot lace.jpg[edit]
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:37, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
File:Spencer Platt High line.jpg[edit]
|
File:Spencer Platt High line.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Ytoyoda (talk) 00:44, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
File:Henri_Cartier-Bresson.jpg[edit]
|
File:Henri_Cartier-Bresson.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
shizhao (talk) 09:22, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
File:World-press-2008.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:World-press-2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
-- Deadstar (msg) 08:36, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
File:FELDMANN.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:FELDMANN.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
GeorgHH • talk 20:24, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
File:Hippolyte Bayard Molinos Montmartre c.1842.jpg[edit]
Hi. Please do not add category Category:Mission Héliographique to all photos taken by Bayard, Le Secq, Le Gray, Mestral and Baldus, because some of them weren't taken for the 'Mission'. As far as I know, these photographers have taken their photos for 'Mission' only in 1851 (however sometimes you can find also photos with date 1852). It's sure that photo File:Hippolyte Bayard Molinos Montmartre c.1842.jpg has nothing to do with 'Mission', because in 1840s 'Mission' hadn't been even created :-) Thank you, Cancre (talk) 13:17, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Defaultsort[edit]
Prosba: pokud zakládáš kategorii fotografce či fotografovi, dej tam rovněž defaultsort. Dík!--Gampe (talk) 17:42, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Deprecated License[edit]
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Ackerman farmer.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 13:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:George-w-ackerman_1931-9_texas_coryell-county_farmer-reading-his-farm-paper.jpg --Svajcr (talk) 13:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Winston Churchill 1941 photo by Yousuf Karsh.jpg[edit]
See deletion reason. --Martin H. (talk) 21:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
File tagging Category:Jiří Růžek[edit]
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Category:Jiří Růžek. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Martin H. (talk) 21:41, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Jiriruzek net 2010 Vinohrady.jpg[edit]
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Jiriruzek net 2010 Vinohrady.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 01:48, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you; OTRS pending|month=August|day=19|year=2010; Yesterday I have sent email to info-cs@wikimedia.org with permission from the author Jiří Růžek. --Svajcr (talk) 16:51, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
You should know...[edit]
You created Category:Bird's-eye view. You should know another contributor nominated it for deletion. Geo Swan (talk) 14:45, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Jan Tomáš[edit]
Jen poznamenávám, že na něj tu už máme šablonu {{Creator:Jan Tomáš}}, která se má vkládat do řádku Author. Zdravím, --Gumruch (talk) 18:27, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks[edit]
Thank you Svajcr for creating the Category: Immagine& Poesia. This artistic literary movement is international and is a really beautiful project that links artists and poets from different parts of the world. We are very grateful. Greetings from Italy--Aeron10 (talk) 05:50, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- It is my work. I know you from czech wiki (yesterday deleted...:-( Good luck! --Svajcr (talk) 05:58, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Photo_comics_Night_Zero_P14.jpg[edit]
|
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Photo_comics_Night_Zero_P14.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Photo_comics_Night_Zero_P14.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:43, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
File:Carroll, Die Rossettis.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Carroll, Die Rossettis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Jappalang (talk) 01:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
File:1998книгаAvoir_20.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:1998книгаAvoir_20.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Yann (talk) 07:43, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
File:Книга_Mparis2002.jpg[edit]
|
File:Книга_Mparis2002.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yann (talk) 07:44, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
File:Скамейки-_трансформация_для_будущего.jpg[edit]
|
File:Скамейки-_трансформация_для_будущего.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yann (talk) 07:44, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Copyright[edit]
Hello,
Please do not import images without proper source, author, description, date and license. Thanks, Yann (talk) 07:47, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
File:Рожденные_в_СССРIgor_Moukhin.jpg[edit]
|
File:Рожденные_в_СССРIgor_Moukhin.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yann (talk) 07:48, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
File:Журнал_Garcusa.jpg[edit]
|
File:Журнал_Garcusa.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yann (talk) 07:49, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
File:PetrMamonov1989.jpg[edit]
|
File:PetrMamonov1989.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yann (talk) 07:49, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
File:DeMeyerMarylin.Miller.jpg[edit]
|
File:DeMeyerMarylin.Miller.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
— Cheers, JackLee –talk– 15:29, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
File:Carroll,_Die_Rossettis.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Carroll,_Die_Rossettis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Narayan (talk) 21:43, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Chybný údaj[edit]
V grafu File:Ausgewählte fotografische Aufnahmeformate.jpg je chybný údaj u formátu 6×8 mm, kde je čistá šířka uvedena 67 místo 76 mm. Kdosi už to ke snímku před rokem a půl poznamenal. Bylo by možné údaj opravit? --ŠJů (talk) 00:15, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Martincreednothing1997_2.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Martincreednothing1997_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Diannaa (talk) 22:06, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Uvolňování přes OTRS[edit]
Dobrý den, posledně jsme hovořili o tom, že bych Vás vždy uvědomil, pokud by došlo k uvolnění nějakých zajímavých fotografií přes OTRS. Tedy jsem vytvořil stránku User:Podzemnik/OTRS, kde to budu doplňovat. Prosím, dejte si ji do sledovaných. Pokud souhlasíte, nebudu Vás uvědomovat přes diskusi, ale přes tuto stránku, resp. přes sledované stránky. Fotky, co už byly uvolněny, snad doplním časem. Napíšu o tom ještě Gampemu. S pozdravem, --Podzemnik (talk) 07:28, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- Za rok 2011 by tam mělo být vše, co jsem uvolňoval já. Je jen velmi malá šance, že by letos bylo uvolněno něco, co nešlo přes mě. V roce 2009 zajišťoval OTRS víceméně jen Mercy, v roce 2010 většinou já, Mercy občas ještě něco také. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:24, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
DMCA takedown[edit]
Svajcr,
In compliance with a request from the copyright holder under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, the Wikimedia Foundation is removing from its servers certain files that were uploaded by you. You may see a list of affected files at the Foundation wiki. Please do not attempt to recreate these files. If you wish to protest a DMCA takedown, please read this information. Best wishes, Philippe (WMF) (talk) 17:56, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
File:Midgley.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Midgley.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Avron (talk) 18:47, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Artists_dining_outdoors_at_Mt._Kisco_1912.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Artists_dining_outdoors_at_Mt._Kisco_1912.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 12:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Flyb.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Flyb.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
82.5.45.32 18:07, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Available light[edit]
I've just put a number of my images in the Category:Available light that you created, but I find myself wondering about its usefulness. Just as one contributor, I've probably put up several thousand photos that could be so classified. Is it really worth noting on each such photo? - Jmabel ! talk 16:00, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you, Jmabel. We have to select only the excelent examples. --Svajcr (talk) 19:21, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
- If your intent is 'only excellent examples', then that shouldn't be a category, that should be a page. We could easily create a page Available light or Available light photography and add appropriate images to that page in a gallery; this approach would also allow commentary on what aspects of available light photography are being illustrated. For example:
English: Long (1.3 second) exposure, posed image, shot at dusk.
English: Shot during a presentation in a cinema; lightened later with GIMP.
English: Available light (left) vs. softbox lighting (right).
File:Oliviero_Toscani_International_Journalism_Festival_4.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Oliviero_Toscani_International_Journalism_Festival_4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Túrelio (talk) 18:28, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Flyb.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Flyb.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Prosfilaes (talk) 23:17, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
File:Nyc-times-square1997.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Nyc-times-square1997.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Lupo 06:46, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Davidman[edit]
Ahoj, File:Eleazar-Davidman1.jpg jsem označil jako copyvio. Na zdroji má větší rozlišení a byl publikován dřív. Upozornil jsem je i na he. --Tlusťa (talk) 13:51, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Categorizing files[edit]
My bot is only uploading files. All the categorizing is done by humans. Now, it looks like all the categories you have mentioned are for photographers or authors. There are two ways you can do this. One is to use a tool like Commons:Cat-a-lot to categorize all the images individually. Alternatively, if you look at the page code, you'll see that they use {{NARA-Author}}. You can also go to the list of authors and IDs at the template [2] and add the category next to the author's name, which will add that category for all works where they are attributed as author in the author field. You may need to add a line for the author using the unique ID from the image page if it is not yet listed. Let me know if this doesn't make sense to you. Dominic (talk) 14:02, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:PennyWolinAge10.jpg[edit]
|
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:PennyWolinAge10.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:PennyWolinAge10.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 00:26, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Иллюстрация из Risse im Patriarchat 4.jpg[edit]
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Иллюстрация из Risse im Patriarchat 4.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Dmitry89 (talk) 15:31, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Category:Charles_E._Brown[edit]
 |
Charles E. Brown has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at Commons:Categories for discussion/2012/01/Category:Charles_E._Brown.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Andy Dingley (talk) 17:58, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Per.huttner.Installation.RKIS.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Per.huttner.Installation.RKIS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
74.240.177.58 20:23, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
File:PeterLik.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:PeterLik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
180.181.252.167 07:58, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Photographic studio categorisation[edit]
Hello, I see you categorized a few of my recent uploads under category:Photographic studios. While One of these show some photographic flashs, the other images were just shot with a normal flash gun against a white / yellowish wall. Esby (talk) 21:34, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Tono Stano[edit]
K souboru http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tono_Stano_selfportrait.JPG mám práva, uploaduji ho z přání samotného autora. Děkuji za upozornění.
- Výborně, pak ale to musíme udělat ještě oficiálně. Musíme poslat text:
Já, Tono Stano, vlastním k fotografii té a té autorská práva a souhlasím s publikováním na wikipedii pod licencí cc-by-sa. Tono Stano.
a poslat to mailem na info-cs@wikimedia.org Správce fotku označí OTRS svolením.--Svajcr (talk) 05:55, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Problem with OTRS templates[edit]
Hi Svajcr. Please have a look at Category:Items missing OTRS ticket ID and my correction of one occurrence. --Leyo 09:35, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
- Well, thank You, --Svajcr (talk) 19:25, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
- Another user helped out before you could do it yourself. :-) --Leyo 21:40, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Bernd and Hilla Becher, Met Museum, New York.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Bernd and Hilla Becher, Met Museum, New York.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Mormegil (talk) 12:34, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
File:Eds bridge.jpg[edit]
|
File:Eds bridge.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Ronhjones (Talk) 19:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
File:396 mikhailov moments1.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:396 mikhailov moments1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Diannaa (talk) 00:03, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Yuridojcportrait.jpg[edit]
|
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Yuridojcportrait.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Yuridojcportrait.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:25, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:Southern poster.jpg[edit]
|
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Southern poster.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Southern poster.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:37, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Tsagolov bantits clash.JPG[edit]
|
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tsagolov bantits clash.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Tsagolov bantits clash.JPG]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:42, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Brassaï[edit]
I think you're right the Brassaï files must be deleted. Can you see to it? Pimbrils (talk) 10:29, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Newton's bar.jpg[edit]
|
File:Newton's bar.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Vera (talk) 10:54, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Sex and Landscapes.jpg[edit]
|
File:Sex and Landscapes.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Vera (talk) 10:56, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Svajcr, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
|
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 09:54, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Robert Mapplethorpe exhibition 2.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Robert Mapplethorpe exhibition 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Eleassar (t/p) 10:34, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:23, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
File:GavinSimonds.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:GavinSimonds.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Fæ (talk) 23:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Atelier de mécanique - 4.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Atelier de mécanique - 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Stefan4 (talk) 14:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Díky![edit]
Díky, že to u Podzemníka furt udržuješ! --Gampe (talk) 19:18, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Category:Ivan Sedliský[edit]
Ahoj, tohle je zrovna dost problematická kategorie: Category:Ivan Sedliský. Ty o tom něco víš? Ty soubory už jednou byly smazány. --Gampe (talk) 16:05, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Jo, už jsemn se to taky dočetl a nějak jsem to tam porovnal. Dík! --Gampe (talk) 16:19, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Nadia Rovderova portret triptych.jpg[edit]
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Nadia Rovderova portret triptych.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Nadia Rovderova portret.JPG
- File:Nadia Rovderova andel svitajici pro cutlog.jpg
- File:Nadia Rovderova Uplnek nad Andelem, z cyklu Prazske podvedomi, 1999.jpg
- File:Nadia Rovderova Svaty Egidius, z cyklu Popradske podvedomi, 2000.jpg
- File:Nadia Rovderova Hledani slunce.jpg
Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thank You, off course. Sended yesterday. Added: OTRS pending|month=June|day=5|year=2013. --Svajcr (talk) 06:36, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks! It would be a shame if those images have to be deleted. :-) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:42, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Category:Lightbox[edit]
|
|
Lightbox has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at Commons:Categories for discussion/2013/06/Category:Lightbox.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:35, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:The Philadelphia Dance Company.jpg[edit]
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:The Philadelphia Dance Company.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 19:43, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Paul Taylor Dance Company.jpg[edit]
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Paul Taylor Dance Company.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 20:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Lewis Carroll (the Reverend Charles Lutwidge Dodgson) Margaret Frances Langton Clarke, 1864.jpg[edit]
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lewis Carroll (the Reverend Charles Lutwidge Dodgson) Margaret Frances Langton Clarke, 1864.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Denniss (talk) 18:01, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
- Solved out. --Gampe (talk) 08:13, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Category:Immagine_&_poesia[edit]
|
|
Category:Immagine_&_poesia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at Commons:Categories for discussion/2013/10/Category:Immagine_&_poesia.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:41, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Najib Albina Photo Lab.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Najib Albina Photo Lab.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
JuTa 20:59, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
File:ARIANA & GERARDO TRASH THE DRESS 2.jpg[edit]
Please fix the page, thanks. --Leyo 17:28, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
File:EF TTD 229 Web (Trash the Dress).jpg[edit]
|
|
File:EF TTD 229 Web (Trash the Dress).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
-mattbuck (Talk) 01:45, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Svajcr, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
|
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Svajcr, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
|
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]
- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Svajcr⧽: العربية, български, Deutsch, English, français, italiano, македонски, മലയാളം, 日本語, русский, svenska, اردو, 中文
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.
Commons:Photo challenge/2014 - January - A bunch of stuff[edit]
Thank you for your nomination on this Photo Challenge. Unfortunately it was uploaded to Commons before the challenge period and so is not eligible. If you have other pictures that are new to Commons in January, then they can be entered. -- Colin (talk) 08:07, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]
- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Svajcr⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]
Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]
- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Svajcr,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Augusto De Luca e Carla Fracci .jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Augusto De Luca e Carla Fracci .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Hypergio (talk) 06:52, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Augusto De Luca fotografa Carla Fracci - 1.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Augusto De Luca fotografa Carla Fracci - 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Hypergio (talk) 06:53, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Augusto De Luca fotografa Carla Fracci - 2.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Augusto De Luca fotografa Carla Fracci - 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Hypergio (talk) 06:53, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Augusto De Luca fotografa Carla Fracci - 3.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Augusto De Luca fotografa Carla Fracci - 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Hypergio (talk) 06:54, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Augusto De Luca fotografa Carla Fracci - 4.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Augusto De Luca fotografa Carla Fracci - 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Hypergio (talk) 06:54, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Стороны збручского идола.jpg[edit]
|
File:Стороны збручского идола.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 15:50, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Стороны збручского идола.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Стороны збручского идола.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Amitie 10g (talk) 16:04, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Vanessa Beecroft, Blonde Figure Lying, 2008.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Vanessa Beecroft, Blonde Figure Lying, 2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Missvain (talk) 08:42, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Jim Rakete Geno Lechner.jpg[edit]
| català | čeština | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | magyar | 日本語 | македонски | Nederlands | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenščina | +/− | |
|
|
The File:Jim Rakete Geno Lechner.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly.
|
Correlatio (talk) 17:46, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
File:František Dostál Vrsovice 1965-1989 (10).tif[edit]
 |
File:František Dostál Vrsovice 1965-1989 (10).tif is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
Reventtalk 23:42, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Irving penn portrait.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Irving penn portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Arroser (talk) 20:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Secondo-Pia.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Secondo-Pia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Jcb (talk) 22:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Bayard, Hippolyte 1801-1887 - Selfportrait as a Drowned man 1840 b.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Bayard, Hippolyte 1801-1887 - Selfportrait as a Drowned man 1840 b.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
82.66.244.97 11:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Noah Kalina workshop 8.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Noah Kalina workshop 8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Trash the dress Anne & Rogério 3.jpg
- File:Trash the dress Anne & Rogério 4.jpg
- File:Trash the dress Anne & Rogério 6.jpg
- File:Trash the dress Anne & Rogério 7.jpg
- File:Trash the dress Anne & Rogério.jpg —LX (talk, contribs) 21:01, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
File:130425 Praha Prague Photo festival 0164.JPG[edit]
|
File:130425 Praha Prague Photo festival 0164.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
File:130425 Praha Prague Photo festival 0164.JPG[edit]
|
|
File:130425 Praha Prague Photo festival 0164.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Yann (talk) 21:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Bayard, Hippolyte 1801-1887 - Selfportrait as a Drowned man 1840 b.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Bayard, Hippolyte 1801-1887 - Selfportrait as a Drowned man 1840 b.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
31.36.229.28 17:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Presentación World Press Photo 2011.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Presentación World Press Photo 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Mechanical Turk (talk) 13:18, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, — Jeff G. ツ 12:24, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Category:Aphelandra_roezlii[edit]
|
|
Aphelandra roezlii has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/01/Category:Aphelandra_roezlii.
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 19:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Mnouriprt1977.jpg[edit]
|
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Mnouriprt1977.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mnouriprt1977.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
SlowManifesto (talk) 10:12, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Green791-Edit.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Green791-Edit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Yann (talk) 12:43, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Rodchenko.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Rodchenko.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Carl Ha (talk) 16:04, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Rodchenko.jpg[edit]
|
|
File:Rodchenko.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
_Margaret_Frances_Langton_Clarke,_1864.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Margaret_Frances_Langton_Clarke,_1864.jpg){kind=link}
_Margaret_Frances_Langton_Clarke,_1864.jpg&action=edit){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
