You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Sure. It will take some time, however, since I'm doing this in my spare time. Do you need the video itself or just the comparison?
Shahin, sorry for the slow answer. Seems like that was the case - I'm doing dry runs on the 4K LCD without issues. Many thanks for pointing out the layer color.
I have another question - I was able to do the dry-runs with the beta version and minimal exposition (3sec) without any noticeable slowdown in 4K (if we ignore slicer slowdown). Does this mean that the above-mentioned optimizations regarding exposure irregularities (i.e. caching layers, etc) have already been implemented in the beta version? If they are not yet implemented, I must say that I'm very impressed with beta performance in 4K.
Hi again,
I have put together a working system with RPi 3B with 4K monitor @ 24-28Hz and I can test optimizations and/or issues related to removing exposure irregularities in 4K support.
So far I have the beta version installed (for the better slicer) and have successfully displayed the dynamic calibration images in true 4K over hdmi.
However when I start to print nothing is shown on the monitor. Am I missing something? Maybe incorrect nanoDLP configuration on my part?
Thank you.
Hello,
I'm about to begin constructing a 4K SLA/LCD printer using nanoDLP but I'm still doing my initial research. Can you please tell me if 4K support is included in latest version of nanoDLP.
Apologies in advance if this topic is closed or I've missed something.
Pages: 1