nanoDLP

as all professional cam to do  as :
edgecam  , mastercam , powemill , featurecam ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qFM8fI7kC8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmNu5IkdOzU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6ISSXFjHiQ

so I recommend to you download trial version of any of CAM, bring your model , and try to make toolpaths for understand how much is headache.
in this case may be you change your mind to the other side as I do .

after nanodlp  I recommend you to look at  direct metal laser sintering (DMLS)
I think this is  future of manufactory .
but not CNC

my post about encoder in 2010

( somebody connected the encoder to the stepper motor?
as far as appropriate?
is from this sense when uprovlenie MACH 3?

say that the MACH 3 may show only the position of the axis but offset deviation nebudet, true or not?
or I misunderstood something?

podskozhite at Covo have experience with encoders

experimenting with stepper engines and having experienced at least 5 different dvigoteley, prishol to the conclusion that the least noise with the Chinese controller
Japanese hybrid engine company SANЁ ....
but those that were with me okozalos small in moshnosti of 1 A and 5.2
therefore, to pass on special stock markets took a 3 hybrid shagovika the same firm is larger by 2 times and 2.9 and in addition to everything with
established opto encoder
but that's no disk imaging on them there
an Internet search returned no significant results
only to find out that he had to drive 200 slots as many as steps per revolution of the engine and how many volts connecting etc.
no disk imaging
here and decided that once hung on the Japs shogovik encoder means it Harashi and you can dig in the naprovlenii

DC's little doubt at the expense of accuracy of this Divays
If the authorization of 200 strips per revolution it therefore can only look at the full step
What, then microstepping with 1/16 as it will show the axis position at this resolution? )

I use UVM-30A sensor

result of experiment , in left side mask with blur in right side original mask no blur .
actually it is looks like same , not much different

I do more brighter around 30% in blur mask .
but original I do not change anything it is same nanodlp generate it
will see how it work .

this one is original from nanodlp

this one is blurry one

I don't care your .... time .
just advice from my experience
but seems is not for you ,
you can do whatever you want even use direct drive with 5 horse power
good luck with that
amen !

Shahin
is it  better like this ?

actually I do not try the original one , I use only blur one .
it workse well , but it increase care time double , frome some point it was  83 mv I down it to 38.9mv
I guess original is too much sharp gradient .
I use 16 x 9 = 144 point it take around 2 and half hours for complete measurement.
but to use it with original save mask  I think it has to be much more measuring points

It working !