nanoDLP

Hi,

I've been away from the machine, kust installed a new RPi and the most recent version, so I have no idea what could have been the behavior in earlier versions
Just found out how to add attachments, hope it works, just pointing out the sort of issue I'm observing. The top slice was done with Printstudio, the bottom one with nanoDLP, same layer height

best

now it is working, just plugged back the camera, it was weird because it was in fact taking pics and saving them in the respective folder, but not showing them in the browser
thanks

Hi,
my build file does say "muve3dls", so I suppose the change worked
but as I said earlier, usually this change would upload some specific "printer profiles" and the inclusion of some custom Gcode to work with the mUVe printer.
thanks

pi@raspberrypi:~ $ ls -l /home/pi/printer/db/
total 20
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1637 Apr 29 13:57 buttons.json
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  284 Apr 29 13:14 calibration.json
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1739 May  3 13:44 machine.json
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1435 May  3 13:50 plates.json
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3519 May  3 14:02 profiles.json
pi@raspberrypi:~ $ ls -l /home/pi/printer/distro/muve3d/opt/db/
total 16
-rw-r--r-- 1 pi pi 1984 Apr 25 15:21 buttons.json
-rw-r--r-- 1 pi pi  307 Apr 25 15:21 calibration.json
-rw-r--r-- 1 pi pi 1901 Apr 25 15:21 machine.json
-rw-r--r-- 1 pi pi 2779 Apr 25 15:21 profiles.json

> Keep dashboard open on a tab, change distribution, checkout dashboard error reports, do you see anything important?
you mean, check the Application log on the nanoDLP dashboard, while changing distribution?

Hi,
I have one comment and question about these issues

- I think the feature proposed by mandreas is quite interesting, I've also been thinking about a work hypothesis which involves configurable exposure times per different layers. I was also thinking that you could take advantage of the already implemented feature of applying blackouts. Instead of a 100% full blackout cover, one could define a cover with a configurable % of either exposure time and/or dimming, and why not, define as well to which layers it should be applied. Just a thought, have no idea how easy/hard these things are to implement

- my question is about the dimming feature, if I got it right, what are defining a perimeter with a custom thickness and a dimming percentage in the center of the object slice, right? similar to the FDM perimeter/infill features?

congrats on the great software, Shahin
best

Thanks for the quick reply,
I tried option 1, involved less changes, but I struggled a little bit with getting it right
I moved to option 2, the wiring was much simpler than I expected and it is working great.
It also improved the pauses before/after printing, now closing the shutter, while in pause. Maybe it was possible to set it up like that while connected to the ramps, but I didn't look over that

thanks again

Thanks Shahin,
I've been learning my ways around SSH. I've seen the data and file system of nanoDLP, I've found the info I was looking for
If I have any suggestion on how to improve any aspect, I'll come back to you
thanks a lot

Thanks Shahin,

then, @muve3d, could you have this information available? I mean, each time a new version for the muve is out, could you acknowledge it somewhere, like on the Instructions document
thanks