Skip to content

More explicit pattern for KBibTeX #1913

Merged
merged 1 commit into from

2 participants

@lszeremeta

Pattern for BibTex is now less general.

Referring to discussion: #1471 (comment)

@shiftkey
GitHub member

Thanks @lszeremeta (and thanks @duetosymmetry for raising the concerns)!

@shiftkey shiftkey merged commit e7caac9 into github:master
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.