nanoDLP

Your major features hit all my  happy buttons. :-)

I'm happy to alpha test on Linux.

Thank you for your support.

Just a quick update on our progress.

We have completed our slicer, we are doing internal testing. I believe after slicer we could move much faster.
Features are not finalized yet but import function supports couple of standard 3d formats including STL. Also it could export STL, SLC and our own custom format for nanodlp.

I agree with you, STOMP is working perfectly. Very high performance with slicer quality close to jewelcad envision profile.

But there is a tradeoff between speed and required RAM, STOMP targeted speed, something like jewelcad targeted memory usage. You can do slicing on very heavy models with jewelcad albeit with lower speed.
We are targeting better speed, both our program and STOMP are using qt c++ but we use qt c++ only for gui, remaining is in pure c so it has potential to surpass its performance. RAM usage is not issue for desktop computers.
But if we hope to at-least integrate slicer part into nanodlp itself, it is something which we need to consider too.

Robustness require time, STL outputs from 3d programs far from perfect. But I have high hopes as guy who do programming on this project, highly skilled in 3d programming and writing game engines.

Any new on this? Any updates?

Is the support generator included in the newer builds? I've added a few STL's, but it looks like they're just being sliced, not supported.

Ah, so it's stand alone software

Hi! What's the progress with support generation? We can't wait to test it!

I will happy to try it at WIP version , let me know please when it possible

Ditto!

Any chance of a public beta? Or a private beta? Or a one off alpha?

I'm really jonesing for a better support generator than what's available. I'd engage in morally questionable behavior in exchange for an alternative, even just to play with.

2nd'd

Anything new here Shahin?