Explanation:
The smallest common multiple between two numbers is the smallest number that both numbers can divide into. This concept can be extended to more than two numbers as well.
We can first start with just finding the smallest common multiple between two numbers. Naively, you can start writing out multiple of each number until you write a multiple that exists from both numbers.
An example would be the numbers 3
and 4
. The multiples of 3
are 3, 6, 9,
12, 15, 18, ...
and the multiples of 4
are 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, ...
. The
first smallest number we run into in both lists is 12
so this is the smallest
common multiple between 3
and 4
.
This problem can be confusing because most people look for the smallest common
multiple of just the two numbers but forget the keyword range. However, this
means that if you are given [1,5]
, then you have to check for the smallest
common multiple for all the numbers [1,2,3,4,5]
that is evenly divisible by
all of them.
Hint: 1
Create an array with all the numbers that are missing from the original array to make it easier to check when having to check for even division.
Hint: 2
You can use remainder operator (%
) to check if the reminder of a division is
0, which means it is evenly divisible.
Hint: 3
If you sort the array from greatest to smallest, then you can use the first two numbers as a first check for the smallest common multiple. This is because they are more likely to be the smallest common multiple than the lower numbers.
Spoiler Alert!
Solution ahead!
Code Solution:
function smallestCommons(arr) {
// Sort array from greater to lowest
// This line of code was from Adam Doyle (http://github.com/Adoyle2014)
arr.sort(function(a, b) {
return b - a;
});
// Create new array and add all values from greater to smaller from the
// original array.
var newArr = [];
for (var i = arr[0]; i >= arr[1]; i--) {
newArr.push(i);
}
// Variables needed declared outside the loops.
var quot = 0;
var loop = 1;
var n;
// Run code while n is not the same as the array length.
do {
quot = newArr[0] * loop * newArr[1];
for (n = 2; n < newArr.length; n++) {
if (quot % newArr[n] !== 0) {
break;
}
}
loop++;
} while (n !== newArr.length);
return quot;
}
Code Explanation:
- Because of the possibility of the smallest common denominator being among the two biggest numbers, it makes sense to check those first, so sort the array.
- Create a new array to sort all the numbers,
newArr
. - Use a descending
for
loop (var i = arr[0]; i >= arr[1]; i--
) to add the numbers from the biggest to the smallest in the new array. - Declare the variables for the quotient so we can access them outside the loop:
- the quotient that'll be our smallest common multiple (
quot
) - the loop number we're checking (
loop
) - the index of the array of numbers (
n
)
- the quotient that'll be our smallest common multiple (
- Use a
do
while
loop to check what we need whilen
is not the same length as the new array. - In the
do
part, we are going to multiply the very first number, times the number of loops, times the second number (quot = newArr[0] * loop * newArr[1];
). - The
loop
part will allows us to increase the number we're checking beyond the greatest number we have without having to change the algorithm. - We enter a
for
loop that will go fromn
being 2 and going up by one (loop++
) while it is smaller than the array with all the numbers (n < newArr.length
). - If the quotient does not divide evenly (
quot % newArr[n] !== 0
), then stop the loop (break;
). If it is even, then check for the next elements (n++
) in the array until it is not even or we find our answer. - Outside the loop, increase the value of loop (
loop++
). - At the end of the loop return the quotient (
return quot;
).
Note: If the array only has two elements, then the for
loop never gets used
and the return value is the product of said numbers.
Alternate solution:
Note: The solution above requires over 2,000 loops to calculate the test case
smallestCommons([1,13])
, and over 4 million loops to calculate
smallestCommons([1,25])
. The alternate code below evaluates
smallestCommons([1,13])
in around 20 loops and smallestCommons([1,25])
in
40, by using a more efficient algorithm.
function smallestCommons(arr) {
for (i = Math.max(...arr); i >= Math.min(...arr); i--) { arr.push(i); }
return arr.slice(2).reduce(function(x, y) {
var a = x, b = y, t = 0;
while (a % b) { a = a % b; t = a; a = b; b = t; }
return x / b * y;
});
}
If you have trouble understanding the .reduce()
method, you can compare it to
this code, which essentially does the same thing:
function smallestCommons(arr) {
for (i = Math.max(...arr); i >= Math.min(...arr); i--) { arr.push(i); }
var lcm = arr[2], a = 0, b = 0, t = 0;
for (i = 3; i < arr.length; i++) {
a = lcm, b = arr[i];
while (a % b) { a = a % b; t = a; a = b; b = t; }
lcm = lcm / b * arr[i];
}
return lcm;
}
This code is based on the Euclidean algorithm for finding smallest common multiples.
Credits:
If you found this page useful, you can give thanks by copying and pasting this
on the main chat: thanks @Rafase282 @Adoyle2014 @erictleung for your help
with Algorithm: Smallest Common Multiple
NOTE: Please add your username only if you have added any relevant main contents to the wiki page. (Please don't remove any existing usernames.)