MORE BALLPOINT NONSENSE
Still working with a BIC Cristal (same pen, btw, which has drawn many hours of polargraph doodles). This time I tried it on Canson XL Recycled Series Bristol paper.
I bought a pad of this paper in a pinch right before Christmas (it was all my local art store had in large format bristol, and I wanted to give some polargraph drawings as gifts), despite being prejudiced against recycled art papers (they tend to have a surface and absorbancy that isn't good for the inking I do on bristol).
As it turned out, yes, the paper stank when paired with the type of pens I wanted to use (pigmas, zigs, sharpies). The paper was too absorbent. Between sucking pens dry and getting blobs whenever the gondola paused, I thought it was a total loss.
Fast forward a few months. "Hey, maybe that crappy, expensive bristol will work with ballpoint pen." Here are the results:
The paper has a smooth side and a rough. Here's the smooth.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cb56/9cb567df802623f0a5e1b0231cb6d49371c54e39" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40f82/40f8276fe0c22ad09505f9c59339fe94e9025fc3" alt="Image"
And the rough side.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b5f0/8b5f0a2a5b15a5bf8ee72545f56e882908c3c577" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1b74/f1b74726a04b8febff58966e1bf7f1997cccab05" alt="Image"
On the plus side, the paper took the ink well, especially the smooth side. The obvious negative aspect is the pen skipped on both tests, and the test is a very small drawing. This same pen has done a very large, 8.5 hour drawing on cheap paper without a skip, so I don't know what's up with the Canson stuff.
My conclusion: I'm still looking for something to do with the Canson.
|